Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary]

João Paulo,

Thank you for your question.  You are correct that foaf:Project is not a
prov:Agent in the vocabulary.  In citations an Agent to include project,
organization, or person can designated as the publisher, distributor, or
producer.  My question is because prov:Agent does not specify foaf:Project
as an agent, should I use prov:Agent or should I create duv:Agent (that I
guess could be a subclass of prov:Agent?)

What do you think?

Thanks,

Eric

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:56 AM, João Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>
wrote:

> Dear Eric,
>
> Would you please clarify the issue?
>
> As far as I am aware, foaf:Project is not a subclass of prov:Agent.
>
>
> Regards,
> João Paulo
>
>
> On 20/11/15, 9:40 AM, "Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
> Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
> >dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary]
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/214
> >
> >Raised by: Eric Stephan
> >On product: Data Usage Vocabulary
> >
> >Data vocabulary reuse question: In the citation model, is it better to
> >use prov:Agent that is a superclass to new classes such as foaf:Project
> >or should we create a new class duv:Agent?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>