Re: ISSUE-202: Relation between dqv, iso 19115/19157 and geodcat-ap

Dear All,
I had the opportunity to take a quick look at Andrea's feedback on DQV[1]
which originated the ISSUE 202, he suggested some new requirements on DQV
 expressivity which I would  summarize in

Should DQV be able to state  that a dataset is  "not conformant" to a given
standard or  its conformance "has not been  evaluated”?

DQV is already able to  express the notion of "Conformance to” a standard
via the property dcterm:conformsTo.  However, according to Andrea's
comments,  we might bring further compatibility to ISO 19157:2013 and
INSPIRE by adding respectively "Not conformat"   and   "not evaluated" in
the DQV expressivity.

Personally, I am quite  in favour to fulfill the first requirement ("Not
conformat") , not very convinced  about the second ("not evaluated").

Do you have any opinion on that?

Regards,

Riccardo

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Aug/0146.html

On 9 October 2015 at 16:00, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> ISSUE-202: Relation between dqv, iso 19115/19157 and geodcat-ap
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/202
>
> Raised by:
> On product:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be
> clean.
>
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------