Re: Help with vocabularies to describe transport information

Hi Mark,

Thanks a lot for the references!

Cheers,
Bernadette

2015-11-09 11:03 GMT-03:00 Mark Harrison <mark.harrison@gs1.org>:

> Hi Bernadette,
>
> In addition, there is a CEN standard called 'Transmodel' ( see
> http://transmodel-cen.eu/ )
>
> There was also a UK government report that mentions various standards
> relevant for multi-modal journey planning:
>
>
> https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/4360/standards-guide.pdf
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> - Mark
>
>
>
>
> On 9 Nov 2015, at 13:26, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
>  wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Pieter,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your answer! I like the idea of using your proposal for
> GTFS vocab. Could you please send me some examples that I could use as a
> starting point to create the examples for the DWBP document [1] ? The idea
> is to present an example with a timetable in both formats: csv and rdf.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Bernadette
> >
> > [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#basicExample
> >
> > 2015-11-08 6:13 GMT-03:00 Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert@ugent.be>:
> > Hi Bernadette,
> >
> > GTFS at this moment is the de facto standard for timetables today. Thus,
> using it to publish transit data is the way to go.
> >
> > Linked GTFS [1] (I'm the author) is indeed a direct mapping of GTFS
> terms to URIs. It's thus interesting to be able to link to both the terms
> ("this thing is a transit stop as defined by gtfs:Stop") and the instances
> from the data ("this thing follows the service schedule as defined in this
> GTFS feed").
> >
> > At this moment, there's a nodejs mapping script [2] to convert a zip
> archive in GTFS-CSV to Linked GTFS. It would be a great use case for this
> WG to recommend a way to configure the baseURIs of the identifiers, and a
> way for Linked GTFS to become the vocabulary/context (cfr. json-ld) of the
> GTFS files. I'd be glad to implement this in [2] as a proof of concept of
> your work here.
> >
> > Mind that Linked GTFS however, is less (or not?) interesting to use to
> e.g., SPARQL for route planning advice. Instead, you could use Linked
> Connections [3] (my PhD topic - WIP).
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Pieter
> >
> > [1] http://vocab.gtfs.org
> > [2] https://github.com/OpenTransport/gtfs-csv2rdf
> > [3] http://linkedconnections.org/
> >
> > --
> > +32486747122
> > Linked Open Transport Data researcher
> > UGent - MMLab - iMinds
> >
> > Board of Directors Open Knowledge Belgium
> > http://openknowledge.be
> >
> > Open Transport working group coordinator at Open Knowledge International
> > http://transport.okfn.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> > Centro de Informática
> > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER: The contents of this e-mail are
> confidential and are not to be regarded as a contractual offer or
> acceptance from GS1 (registered in Belgium).
> If you are not the addressee, or if this has been copied or sent to you in
> error, you must not use data herein for any purpose, you must delete it,
> and should inform the sender.
> GS1 disclaims liability for accuracy or completeness, and opinions
> expressed are those of the author alone.
> GS1 may monitor communications.
> Third party rights acknowledged.
> (c) 2012.
> </a>
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------