- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Thomas Steiner via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Thomas Steiner via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Add an explicit use cases and requirements section (#25) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 30 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Closed: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Closed: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Closed: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Thursday, 23 May)
- Re: [battery] Mark spec as Discontinued Draft (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Friday, 24 May)
- Re: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Friday, 24 May)
- Re: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 24 May)
- Re: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Friday, 24 May)
- Re: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Sunday, 26 May)
- Re: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Sunday, 26 May)
- Re: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 27 May)
- Closed: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 27 May)
- Re: [battery] What’s this spec about again? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Monday, 27 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Chris Wilson via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Thursday, 30 May)
- Re: [battery] Are there new use cases for battery API? (#64) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 30 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report and obsolete this Recommendation (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Friday, 17 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 20 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 27 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Monday, 27 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Monday, 27 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Closed: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 29 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Thursday, 30 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Thursday, 30 May)
- Re: [vibration] Update implementation report (#33) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 30 May)
Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2024 09:35:50 UTC