- From: Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 10:31:15 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
anssiko has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/device-posture: == Wide review tracker == ### About This is a process issue to track [wide review](https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20231103/#wide-review) for the [Device Posture API](https://www.w3.org/TR/device-posture/). An important part of wide review is horizontal review from W3C's [key horizontal groups](https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/#how_to_get_horizontal_review) listed below in **horizontal groups** section. Also feedback from **other stakeholders** is equally important. Additional pointers are welcome via comments. >Legend: >⚪ Review request not submitted >🟡 Review request submitted >🔵 Review feedback received >🟢 Review closed as completed ### Horizontal groups ⚪ ♿ **Accessibility** - [ ] Work through the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html">a11y checklist</a> - [ ] <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/new/choose">Request a review via GitHub</a> from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/">APA</a> - [x] [Spec: Accessibility considerations](https://www.w3.org/TR/device-posture/#accessibility-considerations) - [ ] (link to issue with questionnaire responses) 🟢 📐 **Architecture** - [x] Ask the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/">TAG</a> for review; see <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://tag.w3.org/workmode/">how to work with the TAG</a> - [x] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/575 completed Sep 2021 - See also related reviews: - [x] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/689 completed Jun 2022 - [x] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/690 completed Mar 2022 ⚪ 🌍 **Internationalisation** - [ ] Read the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/International/review-request">Request a review</a> page - [ ] Work through the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/International/i18n-drafts/techniques/shortchecklist">i18n checklist</a> - [ ] <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/issues/new/choose">Request a review via GitHub</a> - [ ] (link to issue with checklist responses) ⚪ 🔍 **Privacy** - [x] Write a "Privacy Considerations" section for your document, taking into account the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/">Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy</a>, <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/fingerprinting-guidance/">Mitigating Browser Fingerprinting in Web Specifications</a>, and <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6973.html">RFC6973</a> - [x] [Self-Review Questionnaire self-assessment](https://github.com/w3c/device-posture/blob/gh-pages/security-privacy-self-assessment.md) - [x] [Spec: Privacy considerations](https://www.w3.org/TR/device-posture/#privacy-considerations) - [ ] <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://github.com/w3cping/privacy-request/issues/new/choose">Request a review via GitHub</a> from the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/Privacy/">Privacy Interest Group</a> ⚪ 🔒 **Security** - [x] Write a "Security Considerations" section for your document, taking into account the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/">Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy</a> - [x] [Spec: Security considerations](https://www.w3.org/TR/device-posture/#security-considerations) status: no known security considerations, no security issues reported - [x] [Self-Review Questionnaire self-assessment](https://github.com/w3c/device-posture/blob/gh-pages/security-privacy-self-assessment.md) - [ ] <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://github.com/w3c/security-request/issues/new/choose">Request a review via GitHub</a> ### Other stakeholders From [who to ask for review](https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/#who_to_ask_for_review): >Horizontal reviews [...] are only a subset of a full wide review, which must also include other stakeholders including Web developers, technology providers and implementers not active in the Working Group, external groups and standards organizations working on related areas, etc. - Mozilla position: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/882 - WebKit position: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/328 ### Other resources - [Origin trial for Foldable APIs](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/foldable-apis-ot) - explains how this JS API and CSS primitives work together - [foldable-devices/demos](https://github.com/foldable-devices/demos) - demos of various use cases for the API Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/device-posture/issues/146 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2024 10:31:16 UTC