public-css-testsuite@w3.org from January 2011 by date

Saturday, 29 January 2011

• Changes to the testsuite build system Peter Linss
• Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid L. David Baron
• Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid Alan Gresley

Friday, 28 January 2011

• Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid L. David Baron
• RE: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid Arron Eicholz

Thursday, 27 January 2011

• Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005 Boris Zbarsky
• split of dynamic-top-change-005 L. David Baron
• Re: Added negative references for rtl-linebreak Boris Zbarsky
• Added negative references for rtl-linebreak L. David Baron
• Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid L. David Baron
• RE: border-*-width-036/047 (etc.?) make invalid assumptions about rounding Arron Eicholz

Wednesday, 26 January 2011

• Re: text-decoration-087 L. David Baron
• Re: text-decoration-087 Gérard Talbot
• text-decoration-087 L. David Baron

Tuesday, 25 January 2011

• quotes-035.htm and Opera L. David Baron

Friday, 21 January 2011

• [RC5] padding-*-073 have incorrect titles Ms2ger
• Re: Implementation report for WebToPDF.NET 1.0 Linss, Peter

Thursday, 20 January 2011

• Implementation report for WebToPDF.NET 1.0 Robert Stam

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

• Update to the test harness Peter Linss

Tuesday, 18 January 2011

• Re: [RC5] font-family-rule-017 still incorrect John Daggett
• Re: [RC3] font-family-rule-017 (was RE: review of Microsoft CSS 2.1 font tests) John Daggett
• Re: Partial implementation report for Prince 7.1 Peter Linss

Sunday, 16 January 2011

• Re: [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid Linss, Peter
• Re: [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid Linss, Peter
• Re: [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid Alan Gresley
• Re: [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid Ms2ger
• Re: [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid fantasai

Saturday, 15 January 2011

• Partial implementation report for Prince 7.1 Ms2ger

Friday, 14 January 2011

• Re: [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid Peter Linss
• Re: [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid Alan Gresley
• [RC5] character-encoding-038 invalid Peter Linss
• Re: page-breaks-101 probably invalid Ms2ger
• RC5 online in the test harness Peter Linss
• [RC5] font-family-rule-017 still incorrect Gérard Talbot
• RC5 tests missing http flag Peter Linss
• Proposed replacements for column-visibility-003 and row-visibility-003 (addition of column-visibility-004) Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] Question on row-visibility-004 Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] row-visibility-003 pass condition not accurate Gérard Talbot
• Re: [RC4] containing-block-001 not testing what it should Alan Gresley
• Harness code changes Peter Linss

Thursday, 13 January 2011

• Re: [RC4] containing-block-001 not testing what it should Gérard Talbot
• Re: [RC4] containing-block-001 not testing what it should Gérard Talbot
• Re: [RC4] containing-block-001 additional Øyvind Stenhaug
• Re: [RC4] containing-block-001 not testing what it should Simon Fraser
• Re: [RC4] containing-block-001 additional Alan Gresley
• [RC4] containing-block-001 not testing what it should Alan Gresley

Wednesday, 12 January 2011

• Re: [RC4] and [RC5beta] containing-block-017 and other containing-block-01*: section 10.1 (inline versus block) Alan Gresley
• RE: RC3 font-size-091 Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC4] 39 'font-size: 0' testcases Arron Eicholz

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

• Re: [RC4] 39 'font-size: 0' testcases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [RC4] 39 'font-size: 0' testcases Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] 'font-size: 0' testcases Gérard Talbot
• RE: RC3 font-size-091 Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] letter-spacing-102: incorrect fail condition Gérard Talbot
• RE: [RC4] numbers-units-018 Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC5beta] absolute-non-replaced-width-010 and absolute-non-replaced-width-013 Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC3] font-family-rule-017 (was RE: review of Microsoft CSS 2.1 font tests) Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC4] font-003 (small corrections) Arron Eicholz
• RE: tests that are invalid because of dependence on subpixel metrics of Ahem font Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid Gérard Talbot
• RE: [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid Gérard Talbot
• RE: [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid Arron Eicholz
• [RC4] page-grammar-001, 002 too complex and too specific Arron Eicholz
• Re: [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] page-break-before-020 invalid Arron Eicholz
• [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid Arron Eicholz

Monday, 10 January 2011

• RE: RC4 Invalid tests Arron Eicholz
• Re: Some table-anonymous-objects tests rely on setting disabled property of style element Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [RC4] numbers-units-018 Gérard Talbot
• Re: [RC4] numbers-units-018 Alan Gresley
• [RC4] floats-108, floats-109, floats-110, floats-126 to 131: "floats wrap in one or two columns" Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] numbers-units-018 Gérard Talbot

Sunday, 9 January 2011

• Re: [RC4] first-letter-dynamic-002 purpose, relevance Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [CSS21] WD 07 Dec. 2010: code and 2 diagrams in section 17.6.2.1 Gérard Talbot
• Re: Some table-anonymous-objects tests rely on setting disabled property of style element Gérard Talbot
• Re: Some table-anonymous-objects tests rely on setting disabled property of style element Simon Fraser
• Re: Some table-anonymous-objects tests rely on setting disabled property of style element L. David Baron
• [CSS21] WD 07 Dec. 2010: code and 2 diagrams in section 17.6.2.1 Gérard Talbot
• Some table-anonymous-objects tests rely on setting disabled property of style element Simon Fraser

Saturday, 8 January 2011

• [RC4] floats-108 and floats-109: "floats wrap in one or two columns" Gérard Talbot
• [RC5beta] absolute-non-replaced-width-010 and absolute-non-replaced-width-013 Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] word-spacing-characters-001 control element has too much space Arron Eicholz
• RE: bidi tests assume undefined letter-spacing behavior Arron Eicholz
• RE: invalid tests about range of integer values Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test Arron Eicholz
• RE: [RC4] color-applies-to-010 Arron Eicholz
• [RC4] color-applies-to-010 Gérard Talbot

Friday, 7 January 2011

• Re: bidi tests assume undefined letter-spacing behavior fantasai
• [RC4] c414-flt-ln-000, c414-flt-ln-001 and c414-flt-ln-003: borders should be removed Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] font-003 (small corrections) Gérard Talbot
• RE: bidi tests assume undefined letter-spacing behavior Arron Eicholz
• [RC4] first-letter-dynamic-002 purpose, relevance Gérard Talbot
• [RC4] c5525-fltwidth-002 w/o harness Gérard Talbot
• Re: before-after-table-parts-001 invalid CSS fantasai
• RE: before-after-table-parts-001 invalid CSS Arron Eicholz
• [RC4] and [RC5beta] containing-block-017 and other containing-block-01*: section 10.1 (inline versus block) Gérard Talbot
• Re: before-after-table-parts-001 invalid CSS fantasai
• Re: before-after-table-parts-001 invalid CSS Gérard Talbot
• RE: before-after-table-parts-001 invalid CSS Arron Eicholz
• Re: before-after-table-parts-001 invalid CSS fantasai
• before-after-table-parts-001 invalid CSS Arron Eicholz
• bidi-breaking-002 invalid Arron Eicholz

Wednesday, 5 January 2011

• Re: RC4 Invalid tests Øyvind Stenhaug
• RE: [RC4] absolute-non-replaced-width-004 and absolute-non-replaced-width-005 proposed assert text Arron Eicholz
• RE: RC3 font-size-091 Arron Eicholz
• RE: user-stylesheet-005, user-stylesheet-006 Arron Eicholz
• user-stylesheet-005, user-stylesheet-006 Simon Fraser

Tuesday, 4 January 2011

• RE: [RC4] absolute-non-replaced-width-008 and absolute-non-replaced-width-009 : corrections to do in /* comments */ Arron Eicholz
• Re: RC4 Invalid tests fantasai

Last message date: Saturday, 29 January 2011 21:27:15 UTC