- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:27:39 +0000
- To: "css21testsuite@gtalbot.org" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Monday, January 10, 2011 7:04 PM Gérard Talbot wrote: > Le Lun 10 janvier 2011 17:51, Arron Eicholz a écrit : > > On Monday, January 10, 2011 5:27 PM Gérard Talbot wrote: > >> Le Lun 10 janvier 2011 16:17, Arron Eicholz a écrit : > >> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/margin-left-001. > >> > htm > >> > > >> > The HR element is by default per HTML4.01 set with align=center > >> > this has no mapping in CSS 2.1 > >> > >> Consider that HR element is a block-level element and it's empty by > >> design: it has no inline boxes. So, the attribute specification > >> align=center can not be mapped to and should not be mapped to > >> 'text-align: center' in CSS. It has to be with 'margin-left: auto' > >> and > >> 'margin-right: auto'. > > > > You are making an assumption that there are no inline boxes. There is > > nothing saying you can't create inline boxes. > > Well.. > > <!ELEMENT HR - O EMPTY -- horizontal rule --> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/present/graphics.html#edef-HR > I knew that was somewhere. It's been a long day. :) > I mean > <hr>foo</hr> > is not valid and > <hr><span>bar</span></hr> > is not valid. > > > > At this point the > > implementation can chose to implement HR however it sees fit. Now > > granted I am not saying that creating inline boxes is the right thing > > to do. I just saying, off the top of my head, I can't think of any > > clarification in CSS saying you can't create them in this case. > > > >> > >> HTML4 states it is aligned "with respect to the surrounding context". > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/present/graphics.html#h-15.3 > > > > I understand what HTML4 says but there is nothing in CSS 2.1 that > > requires CSS to apply to the HR's align attribute in any way. The > > closest text is section 6.4.4 and even that is only a suggestion. > > > >> > and thus setting margin-left on the HR element still may do nothing > >> if > >> > the align attribute isn't overridden which can be the case. > >> > > >> > This case should be removed from the CSS 2.1 test suite because it > >> is > >> > testing an assumption of how HR elements are handled in CSS which > >> > isn't clear. > >> > >> Where should the following <div> go in this example? > >> > >> div > >> { > >> border: 1px inset; > >> margin-left: 0px; > >> width: 33%; > >> } > >> > >> <body> > >> <div></div> > >> </body> > > > > The div should be aligned left. > > > >> Now, why should it be any different for <hr> then? > > > > The HR may be aligned left it may be aligned center CSS doesn't say > > how you override HTML attributes in all cases. > > And it doesn't in this > > specific case. > > > > Section 6.4.4 states that presentational attributes "may" be > > overridden by CSS but it doesn't say that they have to for every case. > > > > After rereading section 6.4.4 I am even more convinced that this case > > is invalid as it stands. > > I understand you: HTML presentational attributes may be overridden by style > sheet rules but CSS 2.1 does not say or state (or specify) exactly how in all > cases and in this specific case. > > I have just removed the margin-left-001: > revision version 1758 > That works. > > At the very least this case should have a "may" > > flag and less strict pass conditions to allow it to pass if the HR is > > centered or left aligned. > > > Arron, years ago, I filed bug 408027 at connect IE beta feedback and carefully > explained all I could with links, references, explanations, etc. I was certain > everything was clear, understood and agreed back then. > > By the way, while we are on this issue, what is your call on > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/text-align-006.htm > > Because, if I understand your reasoning appropriately, then I should remove > that testcase too. > Yeah text-align-006 is another case that falls into this same category. -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 03:28:20 UTC