On 12/07/2010 10:32 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 12/02/2010 10:47 PM, L. David Baron wrote: >> I think this test: >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/page-breaks-101.htm >> is probably invalid. >> >> While the behavior it suggests seems desirable to me, I don't think >> the behavior is what the spec says to do. As far as I can tell, the >> rules in the "Allowed page breaks" section do not allow any breaks >> after the P, only before it, since they only allow breaking in >> margins that are *between* block boxes, not between the last child >> block of a block and its parent block. The rules in that section >> only allow ignoring a margin when it was broken across. > > Fixed. > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/hp/submitted/css2.1/page/page-breaks-101.xht The assert doesn't seem to reflect that: > <meta name="assert" content="When an element would span a page break > solely to render a bottom margin, that margin is instead truncated > and the element does not span pages (even when the element has a > background or border)." /> Ms2gerReceived on Friday, 14 January 2011 20:12:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:16 UTC