Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005

On 1/27/11 5:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> Here is a diff for two *additional* tests that split
> dynamic-top-change-005 into two tests, with the intent that we add
> these additional tests without removing the original, so that we can
> make a better argument about the failures being independent bugs,
> and therefore argue that the lack of two independent implementations
> is not a sign of lack of implementability.
>
> (In particular, WebKit should still fail both halves of the split,
> but Opera should pass 005a (I tested this), IE9 should pass 005b (I
> did not test this), and Gecko should pass both in addition to the
> original.)
>
> Since this test is in the approved/ folder, I believe I need
> reviews.

So we'd have 5, 5a, 5b after this change?  That seems fine to me.

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:40:02 UTC