RE: [RC5beta] absolute-non-replaced-width-010 and absolute-non-replaced-width-013

On Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:08 AM Gérard Talbot wrote:
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10
> /absolute-non-replaced-width-010.htm
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10
> /absolute-non-replaced-width-010.xht
> 
> Actual:
> <meta name="assert" content="When 'left' and 'width' are 'auto' and 'right'
> is not 'auto' element solves for 'left' and 'width' sizes to content.">
> 
> Proposed replacement:
> <meta name="assert" content="When 'left' and 'width' are 'auto' and 'right'
> is not 'auto', then the width is shrink-to-fit and then solve for 'left'.">
> 
> The order of steps to execute may be important.
> I would reuse the same terminology/vocabulary of the spec.
> 
> -----------
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10
> /absolute-non-replaced-width-013.htm
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10
> /absolute-non-replaced-width-013.xht
> 
> Actual:
> <meta name="assert" content="When 'right' and 'width' are 'auto' and 'left'
> is not 'auto' element solves for 'right' and 'width' sizes to content.">
> 
> Proposed replacement:
> <meta name="assert" content="When 'right' and 'width' are 'auto' and 'left'
> is not 'auto', then the width is shrink-to-fit and then solve for 'right'.">
> 
> The order of steps to execute may be important.
> I would reuse the same terminology/vocabulary of the spec.
> 

Fixed/updated for RC5.

--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz

Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 04:41:05 UTC