public-css-testsuite@w3.org from February 2011 by author

Anton Prowse

• Re: [CSS21] margin-collapse-164 is currently invalid per section 9.5.2 (Saturday, 5 February)

Arron Eicholz

• RE: [RC5] caption-side-applies-to-003: more accurate pass conditions (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [RC5] fixed-table-layout-007 has issues (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [RC5] separated-border-model-003 is not testing its assert goals (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [RC5] content-computed-value-002 and content-computed-value-003 identical (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [RC5] border-spacing-applies-to-015 contradicts table-caption-002 (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [RC5] top-offset-001's assert and top-offset-003 wrt containing block (Thursday, 17 February)
• Moved all run-in test cases (Thursday, 3 February)
• RE: [RC3] font-family-rule-017 (was RE: review of Microsoft CSS 2.1 font tests) (Wednesday, 2 February)
• RE: Proposed replacements for column-visibility-003 and row-visibility-003 (addition of column-visibility-004) (Wednesday, 2 February)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [RC5] linking to ref-test of html4/first-letter-001.htm ; bigger first-letter (Wednesday, 16 February)

fantasai

• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-lowercase-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-uppercase-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: [CSS3]white-space-collapsing-discard-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: [RC5]: page-break-inside-006 misses flags (paged) (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht� (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo [CSS Test: text-transform - large-kana - basic cases] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: clipping-016 invalid? (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: [RC4] floats-108, floats-109, floats-110, floats-126 to 131: "floats wrap in one or two columns" (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: [RC4] letter-spacing-102: incorrect fail condition (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: bidi tests assume undefined letter-spacing behavior (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005 (Wednesday, 2 February)

Gabriele Romanato

• Tests on interaction with JavaScript needed: cascade, specificity and similia (Thursday, 3 February)

Gérard Talbot

• [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-valid-characters-001: questions (Saturday, 26 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-rule-003: pass conditions, invalid flag and assert text (Saturday, 26 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-rule-002: pass conditions, line-height and assert text (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-name-024 : its reftest and text assertion (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion (Friday, 25 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] white-space-collapsing-001 (unexpected horizontal scrollbar) (Friday, 25 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion (Friday, 25 February)
• Fixed Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] link-visited-selector-001 questionable under 2 RFCs (Monday, 21 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] list-style-position-applies-to-* testcases: inheritance of list-style-position versus applicability (Monday, 21 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] link-visited-selector-001 questionable under 2 RFCs (Monday, 21 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] first-line-pseudo-017 and 018: "line should be green" (Monday, 21 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] first-line-pseudo-011 improvements (Monday, 21 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] first-letter-selector-015 inaccurate pass conditions (Monday, 21 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] dom-hover-001 and dom-hover-002 (Monday, 21 February)
• [RC5, pre-RC6] floats-110 and "floats wrap in one or two columns" (Monday, 21 February)
• RE: [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid (Sunday, 20 February)
• [RC5] first-letter-quote-003|4|5|6.htm and their correspondent reftest (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Tuesday, 15 February)
• [RC5] linking to ref-test of html4/first-letter-001.htm ; bigger first-letter (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Thursday, 10 February)
• [RC5] top-offset-001's assert and top-offset-003 wrt containing block (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Border-spacing implementation in an HTML table with at least 2 table-row-groups elements (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] issues or improvements for c71-fwd-parsing-004 , c566-list-stl-001 , c565-list-pos-000 , c5525-fltcont-000 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] caption-side-applies-to-003: more accurate pass conditions (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] content-computed-value-002 and content-computed-value-003 identical (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] separated-border-model-003 is not testing its assert goals (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] border-spacing-applies-to-015 contradicts table-caption-002 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] fixed-table-layout-007 has issues (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c5524-height-002 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c548-ln-ht-002 invalid; invalid flag missing (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c547-indent-000 invalid (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c43-center-000 invalid; c5525-fltwidth-002 too (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c542-letter-sp-000 invalid (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c541-word-sp-000 invalid (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c526-font-sz-002 invalid (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [RC5] c43-rpl-bbx-002 invalid (need corrections) ; c43-rpl-ibx-000 invalid (need corrections) (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: clipping-016 invalid? (Sunday, 6 February)

John Daggett

• Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion (Friday, 25 February)

Koji Ishii

• RE: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht (Saturday, 26 February)
• RE: [CSS3]text-transform-uppercase-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• RE: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• RE: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht (Wednesday, 9 February)

L. David Baron

• Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005 (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: Wording of text-transform-bicameral-* (Tuesday, 1 February)

Leif Halvard Silli

• broken test page (namespaces) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Test case for the \* type selector (CSS3 selectors) (Sunday, 20 February)

Peter Linss

• clipping-016 invalid? (Sunday, 6 February)
• Night Test Suite Builds live in the harness (Tuesday, 1 February)

Robert Stam

• Question about at-page-rule-001 (Monday, 14 February)
• [RC5]: page-break-inside-006 misses flags (paged) (Friday, 11 February)
• abspos-010 result unclear. (Thursday, 3 February)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Wording of text-transform-bicameral-* (Tuesday, 1 February)

taka oshiyama

• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht (Friday, 25 February)
• [CSS3]text-decoration-line-underline-001.xht (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [CSS3]text-decoration-line-overline-001.xht (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [CSS3]text-decoration-line-line-through-001.xht (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [CSS3]text-decoration-line-none-001.xht (Wednesday, 23 February)
• [CSS3]white-space-collapsing-trim-inner-001.xht (Tuesday, 22 February)
• [CSS3]text-emphasis-color-001.xht (Monday, 21 February)
• [CSS3]white-space-collapsing-preserve-breaks-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• [CSS3]white-space-collapsing-discard-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• [CSS3]text-indent-percentage-001.xht (Wednesday, 16 February)
• [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-lr-002.xht (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl-001.xht?(B (Tuesday, 15 February)
• [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl-001.xht (Tuesday, 15 February)
• [CSS3]text-transform-uppercase-001.xht (Tuesday, 15 February)
• [CSS3]text-transform-none-001.xht (Tuesday, 15 February)
• [CSS3]text-transform-lowercase-001.xht (Tuesday, 15 February)
• [CSS3]text-transform-capitalize-001.xht (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Monday, 14 February)
• [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht?(B (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Thursday, 10 February)
• RE: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht?(B (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Thursday, 10 February)
• [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht (Wednesday, 9 February)
• [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo [CSS Test: text-transform - large-kana - basic cases] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo (Friday, 4 February)

Øyvind Stenhaug

• Re: abspos-010 result unclear. (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: Wording of text-transform-bicameral-* (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Wording of text-transform-bicameral-* (Tuesday, 1 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 26 February 2011 22:45:06 UTC