Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005

On 01/27/2011 02:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/27/11 5:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>> Here is a diff for two *additional* tests that split
>> dynamic-top-change-005 into two tests, with the intent that we add
>> these additional tests without removing the original, so that we can
>> make a better argument about the failures being independent bugs,
>> and therefore argue that the lack of two independent implementations
>> is not a sign of lack of implementability.
>> (In particular, WebKit should still fail both halves of the split,
>> but Opera should pass 005a (I tested this), IE9 should pass 005b (I
>> did not test this), and Gecko should pass both in addition to the
>> original.)
>> Since this test is in the approved/ folder, I believe I need
>> reviews.
> So we'd have 5, 5a, 5b after this change? That seems fine to me.

Looks ok to me, too.


Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 09:06:15 UTC