On 01/27/2011 02:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 1/27/11 5:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote: >> Here is a diff for two *additional* tests that split >> dynamic-top-change-005 into two tests, with the intent that we add >> these additional tests without removing the original, so that we can >> make a better argument about the failures being independent bugs, >> and therefore argue that the lack of two independent implementations >> is not a sign of lack of implementability. >> >> (In particular, WebKit should still fail both halves of the split, >> but Opera should pass 005a (I tested this), IE9 should pass 005b (I >> did not test this), and Gecko should pass both in addition to the >> original.) >> >> Since this test is in the approved/ folder, I believe I need >> reviews. > > So we'd have 5, 5a, 5b after this change? That seems fine to me. Looks ok to me, too. ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 09:06:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:16 UTC