- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:02:08 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org, fantasai@inkedblade.net
On Wednesday 2011-02-02 01:05 -0800, fantasai wrote: > On 01/27/2011 02:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >On 1/27/11 5:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >>Here is a diff for two *additional* tests that split > >>dynamic-top-change-005 into two tests, with the intent that we add > >>these additional tests without removing the original, so that we can > >>make a better argument about the failures being independent bugs, > >>and therefore argue that the lack of two independent implementations > >>is not a sign of lack of implementability. > >> > >>(In particular, WebKit should still fail both halves of the split, > >>but Opera should pass 005a (I tested this), IE9 should pass 005b (I > >>did not test this), and Gecko should pass both in addition to the > >>original.) > >> > >>Since this test is in the approved/ folder, I believe I need > >>reviews. > > > >So we'd have 5, 5a, 5b after this change? That seems fine to me. > > Looks ok to me, too. Landed: http://test.csswg.org/svn-view?view=revision&revision=1819 -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 17:02:41 UTC