Re: Wording of text-transform-bicameral-*

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <> wrote:
> Another potential issue is that the characters will be exactly identical if
> no suitable font is found and a replacement character is rendered instead.
> Should probably also clarify that each pair should be different from all the
> other pairs.

The note at the bottom of those tests implies that seeing the
replacement character is an error.  Is that enough?


Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:27:41 UTC