- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:04:52 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "John Daggett" <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Hello David & John, http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/font-family-name-024.htm (RC5) http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/font-family-name-024.htm http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/mozilla/submitted/fontreftests/font-family-name-024.htm http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/mozilla/submitted/fontreftests/font-family-name-024.xht http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/mozilla/submitted/fontreftests/font-family-name-024-ref.htm http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/mozilla/submitted/fontreftests/font-family-name-024-ref.xht 1- <meta name="assert" content="System font names are only allowed with the font shorthand, not in font-family rules"> but after the clarification talks we had in the thread font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Oct/0171.html that is not true 2- The reftest for font-family-name-024 is also wrong. regards, Gérard Talbot -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC5; January 11th 2011): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Friday, 25 February 2011 01:20:58 UTC