Next generation browser
ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
- Re: ETags, If-Match and database versions
Minor normative change to RFC6265bis
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-18.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-17.txt
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pardue-httpbis-identity-digest-00.txt
Re: Declarative HTTP Spec Test Suite
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-07.txt
POST+Upgrade, or unexpected limitation of RFC8441
- Re: POST+Upgrade, or unexpected limitation of RFC8441
- Re: POST+Upgrade, or unexpected limitation of RFC8441
Review of draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01
Simplify cookie header field grammar in 6265bis
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-16.txt
New Cookies Draft
Call for Adoption: draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http
Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up
Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-11
A new HTTP response code for "OK but busy"
An HTTP header to request OpenGraph or schema.org metadata
A New HTTP Request Header for Specifying Task Contexts
- Re: A New HTTP Request Header for Specifying Task Contexts
- Re: A New HTTP Request Header for Specifying Task Contexts
- Re: A New HTTP Request Header for Specifying Task Contexts
Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
- Re: Handling Cookies is a Minefield
Partial review of Resumable Uploads draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-05
DRAFT minutes for IETF 121
Early allocation of the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code
- Re: Early allocation of the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code
- Re: Early allocation of the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code
- Re: Early allocation of the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code
today's meeting
Is "*/xml" a valid value for the Accept field
Question about the "One Round-Trip Reauthentication" for HTTP SCRAM (RFC 7804)
Additional topic for Thursday: AD-requested feedback
resumable uploads
New draft: HTTP Version Translation of the Capsule Protocol
resumable uploads vs multiple 1xx responses vs Java clients
IETF 121 Meeting Info
HTTP WG meeting Dublin now...
Nomcom feedback
Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
[Errata Rejected] RFC9110 (8138)
[Errata Verified] RFC9421 (8102)
[Errata Verified] RFC9421 (8103)
[Errata Verified] RFC9530 (8158)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis-07
Re: Please review HTTP performance aspects of Incremental Font Transfer
How big can the protocol elements in HTTP be?
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9530 (8158)
DRAFT agenda for IETF 121, Dublin
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8154)
Re: [Webtransport] [Masque] Endpoint requirements for unknown Capsules
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-joshco-symmetric-h2-01.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-01.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-05.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-06.txt
I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02
- Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02
- Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02
Comment on draft "The HTTP QUERY Method"
WRAP_UP Capsule
Compression dictionary support - now live in Chrome 130
Re: 103 Early Hints
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00.txt
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-secondary-server-certs-01.txt
Re: Review of draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00
Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis
- Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis
- Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis
Re: Invalid Characters in URLs
Re: RFC 9651 on Structured Field Values for HTTP
RE: Possible need for new 3xx status code Temporarily See Other
Fwd: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain
- Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain