Re: Early allocation of the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code

Unsurprisingly, I support early allocation of the codepoint

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024, at 10:41, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Please do allocate a codepoint.
> 
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024, at 09:48, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > As discussed in the meeting yesterday, the 104 (Upload Resumption 
> > Supported) status code specified in the Resumable Uploads 
> > specification[1] might benefit from early allocation into the HTTP 
> > Status Code registry[2] -- both to assist in early deployment testing 
> > and to avoid potential conflicts.
> >
> > Per RFC 7120[3] Section 3.1, this e-mail serves as a consensus call for 
> > this early allocation. Please indicate whether you support this early 
> > allocation. We'll consider both what we heard in the room as well as 
> > responses here.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > 1. 
> > https://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload.html#name-iana-considerations
> > 2. As defined in 
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-status-code-extensibility
> > 3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7120.html
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
>