Re: Early allocation of the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code

Hi Francesca,

We seem to have consensus in HTTP to make an early allocation of a status code; see below.

Cheers,


> On 8 Nov 2024, at 9:48 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> As discussed in the meeting yesterday, the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code specified in the Resumable Uploads specification[1] might benefit from early allocation into the HTTP Status Code registry[2] -- both to assist in early deployment testing and to avoid potential conflicts.
> 
> Per RFC 7120[3] Section 3.1, this e-mail serves as a consensus call for this early allocation. Please indicate whether you support this early allocation. We'll consider both what we heard in the room as well as responses here.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 1. https://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload.html#name-iana-considerations
> 2. As defined in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-status-code-extensibility
> 3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7120.html
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Monday, 11 November 2024 11:24:28 UTC