- From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:09:42 +0000
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- CC: "fielding@gbiv.com" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "julian.reschke@greenbytes.de" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, "httpbis-ads@ietf.org" <httpbis-ads@ietf.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, "mliveon@icloud.com" <mliveon@icloud.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, this errata is clearly spam and should be rejected. — Justin > On Oct 22, 2024, at 10:29 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, > "HTTP Semantics". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8154 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: McCoy L Stevens <mliveon@icloud.com> > > Section: 9 > > Original Text > ------------- > 9110 > > Corrected Text > -------------- > 1 > > Notes > ----- > Back door > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9110 (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19) > -------------------------------------- > Title : HTTP Semantics > Publication Date : June 2022 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : INTERNET STANDARD > Source : HTTP > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2024 20:09:49 UTC