Re: Early allocation of the 104 (Upload Resumption Supported) status code

I also support this early allocation.
David

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 11:12 AM Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com> wrote:

> Unsurprisingly, I support early allocation of the codepoint
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024, at 10:41, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
> Please do allocate a codepoint.
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024, at 09:48, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > As discussed in the meeting yesterday, the 104 (Upload Resumption
> > Supported) status code specified in the Resumable Uploads
> > specification[1] might benefit from early allocation into the HTTP
> > Status Code registry[2] -- both to assist in early deployment testing
> > and to avoid potential conflicts.
> >
> > Per RFC 7120[3] Section 3.1, this e-mail serves as a consensus call for
> > this early allocation. Please indicate whether you support this early
> > allocation. We'll consider both what we heard in the room as well as
> > responses here.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > 1.
> >
> https://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload.html#name-iana-considerations
> > 2. As defined in
> >
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-status-code-extensibility
> > 3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7120.html
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>