- From: Stefan Matsson <s.matsson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:00:21 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 11 November 2024 08:14:14 UTC
I support this too Stefan On Sat, Nov 9, 2024, 13:30 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 08.11.2024 10:48, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > As discussed in the meeting yesterday, the 104 (Upload Resumption > Supported) status code specified in the Resumable Uploads specification[1] > might benefit from early allocation into the HTTP Status Code registry[2] > -- both to assist in early deployment testing and to avoid potential > conflicts. > > > > Per RFC 7120[3] Section 3.1, this e-mail serves as a consensus call for > this early allocation. Please indicate whether you support this early > allocation. We'll consider both what we heard in the room as well as > responses here. > > ... > > +1 > > Best regards, Julian > > PS: I have a TODO to summarize existing 1xx codes, and how a user-agent > can use them (see <https://github.com/greenbytes/java-http-1xx-tests>). > Several parties told me that more use cases we have, the more likely it > would be that a callback API would surface... > >
Received on Monday, 11 November 2024 08:14:14 UTC