- From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@meta.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:25:45 +0000
- To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SA1PR15MB437095B24515BF83F36798BBB34C2@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Section 2.3 says "Clients MUST NOT send the WRAP_UP capsule.". This strikes me as excessively restrictive. I understand that client->server WRAP_UP is not sensible for proxies, but the Capsule Protocol is not limited to proxies. --Ben ________________________________ From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2024 5:41 PM To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Subject: WRAP_UP Capsule Hi HTTP enthusiasts, Thanks again for the good discussion at IETF 120 about the WRAP_UP capsule. Since then, Lucas Pardue has joined me as co-author on this document, and rewrote the explanation text to integrate the discussion we've had Hi HTTP enthusiasts, Thanks again for the good discussion at IETF 120 about the WRAP_UP capsule. Since then, Lucas Pardue has joined me as co-author on this document, and rewrote the explanation text to integrate the discussion we've had so far. We just submitted a -01. We'd love to hear your thoughts. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up/__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8St_XzKAfZyc7iFKFVB4pdmW2sGwjjldZp-gjG9NGz17iKpSMs4HKUOiAeoqwL1khse9LY43swxsFWW-PrG9$> https://davidschinazi.github.io/draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up/draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://davidschinazi.github.io/draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up/draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8St_XzKAfZyc7iFKFVB4pdmW2sGwjjldZp-gjG9NGz17iKpSMs4HKUOiAeoqwL1khse9LY43swxsFWZrdgG-$> Thanks, David
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2024 15:25:59 UTC