www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from December 2002 by author

Adam Olsen

• field of use problems (Wednesday, 11 December)

Adrian Godwin

• Patents in W3C standards (Monday, 2 December)

Andrea Tasso

• Comment about W3C patent policy (Thursday, 19 December)

Andy Smith

• Objection to "field of use" restriction (Thursday, 5 December)

Bernd Jungblut

• Comment on the "last call draft" (Sunday, 1 December)

Bill Richardson

• I oppose including any patented technology in open standards. (Tuesday, 10 December)

Brady, Scot [IT]

• revoke field-of-use restrictions (Wednesday, 4 December)

Carl-Fredrik Enell

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Friday, 13 December)

Charles Forsythe

• No to patents in standards (Sunday, 8 December)

Chris Lale

• Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy (Tuesday, 17 December)

Chris Lesner

• FSF's Position on Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy (Monday, 16 December)

Csigas

• SUPPORT GNU, please! (Sunday, 1 December)

Cyril Bosselut

• W3 Consortium Patent Policy Working Group (Thursday, 28 November)

Dan Kegel

• Re: Limited domain a compromise, but much better than RAND (Tuesday, 31 December)

Dave Love

• field of use restrictions (Monday, 23 December)

David M. Lehrian

• FSF's Position on Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy (Wednesday, 4 December)

David Orchard

• BEA comments on W3C RF Patent Policy (Monday, 9 December)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• GPL and LGPL incompatibilities in patent policy (Tuesday, 31 December)

Eric Kidd

• Re: Limited domain a compromise, but much better than RAND (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Limited domain a compromise, but much better than RAND (Tuesday, 31 December)

Federico Heinz

• Re: W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 5 December)

Felix Rabe

• Free Software / Open Source compatibility (Friday, 6 December)

Fernandez Martinez, Alejandro

• Royalty-free patents in w3c (Monday, 16 December)

Franco Favento de i Favento de Trieste

• Your Patent Policy (Wednesday, 4 December)

Frank Ruell

• Free standards (Thursday, 12 December)

George Kerscher

• IP Policy comments from the DAISY Consortium (Saturday, 21 December)

Godbey, David

• Reject "field of use" restrictions on W3C standards (Wednesday, 4 December)

HAMILTON, DALE K (SBCSI)

• W3C royalty-free vs. GNU public license (Tuesday, 3 December)

Hiroshi Kawamura

• Patent Policy Comment (Monday, 23 December)

info skylimit

• Pleace don't (Friday, 6 December)

ivan

• 你的公司有比較大嗎 (Friday, 13 December)

Ivan Baldo

• Item 3 incompatibility with GPL section 7 (Wednesday, 11 December)

J.B. Nicholson-Owens

• Objection to the "field of use" restriction of proposed patent policy (Friday, 27 December)

Jakub Šafář

• Last Call draft of W3 Consortium Patent Policy Working Group (Tuesday, 3 December)

James Graves

• Section 3 of proposed patent policy (Tuesday, 10 December)

Jan-Oliver Wagner

• great concern regarding planned future W3C patent policy (Monday, 2 December)

Jerome Alet

• patent policy may harm Free Software (Monday, 2 December)

Jesse Goerz

• Field of use restrictions (Wednesday, 11 December)

Jiba

• W3C Patent policy and Free Softwares (Sunday, 1 December)

Jim Peters

• "field of use" bug in W3C patent policy (Tuesday, 31 December)

Johnix

• Patent royalties for standards ???? (Saturday, 30 November)

JOSEPH LINCOLN MICHELA

• Concerns about Field of Use (Thursday, 5 December)

Laurent Pinchart

• RF License requirements and GPL software (Sunday, 15 December)

Lionel Elie Mamane

• W3C Patent Policy: Comment on last call draft (Wednesday, 4 December)

maininip@post.ch

• Comment about "RF"-patent-policy (Tuesday, 3 December)

Marc Daya

• rf patents (Monday, 9 December)

Mario Bonilla

• please, prohibit the imposition of "field of use" restrictions on patent claims contributed to W3C standards. (Wednesday, 11 December)

Martin Houston

• Objection to the Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy (Thursday, 26 December)

Max Morawski

• Royalty-free patent licensing (Wednesday, 11 December)

Michael Challis

• Comments (Wednesday, 11 December)

Mike Brodbelt

• Field of Use restriction (Wednesday, 11 December)

Nic Ferrier

• "field of use" and free software (Wednesday, 4 December)

Oisin C. Feeley

• "Royalty-free" Last Call Draft proposals (Monday, 16 December)

Onno Timmerman

• patents (Monday, 2 December)

Opoku-Boadu, Samuel

• This is very bad (Thursday, 5 December)

Per Starback

• field of use restrictions (Thursday, 5 December)

Peter Berenyi

• Libre Patent Manifesto Ver. 0.1 (Wednesday, 1 January)
• Re: Limited domain a compromise, but much better than RAND (Wednesday, 1 January)
• The TRIPS Treaty and Software Patents - FFII concerns about software patentability (Saturday, 21 December)
• Who understands section 6 of RF Reqs? (Friday, 20 December)
• No FoU in W3C standards (pretty pretty pleaaase) (Thursday, 19 December)

Petter Sundlöf

• W3 standards patent policies (Monday, 2 December)

Rafael Villar Burke

• "field of use" restriction (Tuesday, 10 December)

RBonazzo

• Bad idea (Wednesday, 4 December)

Richard Michael

• Prohibition of "field of use" restrictions on contributed patents (Tuesday, 31 December)

Richard Smith

• RF patent restriction is insufficient. (Sunday, 8 December)

RICHARD Yann

• No to the Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy (Thursday, 28 November)

Rob Nichols

• W3C Patent Policy (Friday, 13 December)

Robert Diblasi

• PLEASE MAKE PATENT POLICY GPL COMPATIBLE (Tuesday, 31 December)

Robert William Hutton

• Field of Use restrictions (Wednesday, 11 December)

Sam Halliday

• W3C standards (Thursday, 5 December)

Saravanan

• Remove "field of use" restriction (Wednesday, 11 December)

Scheepens

• Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy is inconflict with the GPL !!! (Thursday, 12 December)

Scott Sharkey

• Royalty Free Patents in "Standards" (Wednesday, 27 November)

Sergey Spiridonov

• objection (Thursday, 5 December)

Seth Johnson

• FICPI Demands Unlimited Patentability Worldwide (Friday, 20 December)
• Swedish Courts Oppose Unlimited Patentability (Friday, 20 December)
• Amazon Patent on Coordinating Gift Delivery (Thursday, 12 December)
• EPO President: Patents Unsuited for Software (Thursday, 5 December)

Simo Sorce

• patent policy of w3c (Monday, 2 December)

SONDEREGGER Bernhard

• Patent policy and GPL Section 7 (Friday, 6 December)

sstouden@thelinks.com

• Re: Field of use restrictions (Saturday, 14 December)

stephan beal

• yet another GNU user (Wednesday, 11 December)

Steve O'Daniel

• Re: W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 5 December)
• W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 5 December)

Susan Lesch

• Summary of 2 December 2002 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference (Saturday, 7 December)

Terry

• in ref: W3C Royalty-Free (RF) Licensing Requirements (Saturday, 21 December)

Thom Wysong

• GPL-Incompatible Web Standards (Wednesday, 4 December)
• GPL-Incompatible Web Standards? (Wednesday, 4 December)

Tim Laverty

• Re: W3C standards (Monday, 9 December)

Tobias Hoevekamp

• Why restricting our freedom? (Monday, 2 December)

tompoe@renonevada.net

• Re: Objection to the Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy (Friday, 27 December)

Wiles, Edwin

• Comments on WD-patent-policy-20021114 (Tuesday, 17 December)

www-patentpolicy-comment@tento.net

• Comments on patent policy (Tuesday, 3 December)

Zenaan Harkness

• Limits based on Field of Use (Tuesday, 10 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 23:37:07 UTC