w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from January to March 2014 by author

Adam Cooper

• RE: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Friday, 10 January)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• aria-label and aria-labelledby support on images (Thursday, 20 February)
• Commenting on WCAG via GitHub (Monday, 20 January)

Angela Punshon

• Invitation to participate in a research study about "Creating an Inclusive Web Framework" (Monday, 31 March)

Bourne, Sarah (ITD)

• RE: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves (Friday, 21 February)

Brigitte Bornemann

• deprecated? was AW: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)

Bryan Garaventa

• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Using Alt Text on the Link Element (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Tuesday, 14 January)

Carlos A Velasco

• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)

Charles McCathie Nevile

• Re: implementing Canvas to assure accessibility (Tuesday, 11 March)

Christine Kowalski

• Mouse pointer change of state accessibility question (Friday, 21 March)

Christophe Strobbe

• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Using Alt Text on the Link Element (Wednesday, 5 March)

David Best

• RE: Using Alt Text on the Link Element (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Using Alt Text on the Link Element (Wednesday, 5 March)

Denis Boudreau

• Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Wednesday, 8 January)

Devarshi Pant

• Re: Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 (Thursday, 27 February)

Druckman,Geri

• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• role heading and attribute aria-level (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)

Duff Johnson

• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)

Foliot, John

• RE: Using Alt Text on the Link Element (Wednesday, 5 March)

Frank M. Palinkas

• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Thursday, 6 February)

Gijs Veyfeyken

• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Friday, 7 March)

Gunderson, Jon R

• RE: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Tuesday, 7 January)

Hays, Keith A

• RE: Required Form Fields Question (Friday, 7 March)

Homme, James

• RE: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves (Monday, 24 February)
• Using Maps (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves (Friday, 21 February)
• Layout Tables With Summary Attributes (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Tuesday, 18 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Tuesday, 11 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Monday, 10 February)
• Incorrect Example (Friday, 24 January)

Ian Sharpe

• RE: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Saturday, 29 March)
• RE: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Saturday, 29 March)
• Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Friday, 28 March)

Ian Yang

• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Confused by the use of sectioning elements and DL (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Monday, 10 February)

J. Albert Bowden

• Re: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)

Jan Eric Hellbusch

• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 15 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)

Jan Heck

• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)

Jennifer Sutton

• implementing Canvas to assure accessibility (Monday, 10 March)
• WebAIM: Loss Aversion and Web Accessibility (Friday, 31 January)

Jon Avila

• Re: Mouse pointer change of state accessibility question (Friday, 21 March)

Jonathan Avila

• RE: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes (Saturday, 22 February)
• RE: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Tuesday, 18 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Thoughts on ARIA10: Using aria-labelledby to provide a text alternative for non-text content (Monday, 27 January)

Jorge Fernandes

• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Sunday, 9 February)

Karl Groves

• Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Tuesday, 7 January)

Kyle Montague

• Presenting TACCESS Journal Articles at the ASSETS 2014 Conference (Thursday, 30 January)

Lainey Feingold

• New Accessibility Agreement: WCAG 2.0 AA standard for web and mobile (Wednesday, 12 February)

Lastort Joanne L [Contractor]

• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS (Friday, 21 February)

Lorraine Palomino

• Re: Mouse pointer change of state accessibility question (Friday, 21 March)

Lukaszek, Amy

• Re: Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 (Thursday, 27 February)

Mark Sadecki

• Re: iOS7 voiceover date input issue (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: iOS7 voiceover date input issue (Thursday, 16 January)

Mike Elledge

• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Monday, 17 February)
• HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Tuesday, 7 January)

Neil King

• Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Friday, 14 February)

Olaf Drümmer

• Re: implementing Canvas to assure accessibility (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Using Maps (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: H43 and header cell relationships (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: H43 and header cell relationships (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Thursday, 6 February)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Thursday, 6 February)

Phill Jenkins

• Re: Dialog behaviour and screen readers (Friday, 28 March)

Pierre Dubois

• Re: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: H43 and header cell relationships (Thursday, 20 February)

Ramón Corominas

• Re: Using Alt Text on the Link Element (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers (Sunday, 23 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves - CSS (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Layout Tables With Summary Attributes (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 8 February)
• Definition Lists vs. Data Tables [Was: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria] (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Semantic implications of tabindex="0"? (Tuesday, 14 January)

Roger Hudson

• RE: iOS7 voiceover date input issue (Thursday, 16 January)
• iOS7 voiceover date input issue (Thursday, 16 January)

Sailesh Panchang

• Required Form Fields Question (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Required Form Fields Question (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [WebAIM] Tables with sticky headers (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: H43 and header cell relationships (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Thursday, 6 February)
• Aria-invalid for error indication (Monday, 6 January)

Shawn Henry

• WAI-ARIA 1.0 is completed W3C Recommendation (Thursday, 20 March)
• Web Accessibility Tutorials in Progress (Monday, 17 March)
• W3C WAI at CSUN 2014 (Tuesday, 11 March)
• WCAG Techniques & Understanding WCAG Updated March 2014 (Tuesday, 11 March)
• WAI-IG Mailing List reminders (Thursday, 27 February)
• Reminder: comments due Friday 28 February - Call for Review: Pre-Publication Draft of WCAG-EM - Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (Monday, 24 February)
• Reminder: deadline Friday - Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Tuesday, 11 February)
• WAI-ARIA 1.0 is Proposed Recommendation (Thursday, 6 February)
• Call for Review: Pre-Publication Draft of WCAG-EM - Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (Thursday, 30 January)
• W3C WAI at ICCHP - proposals due 1 February (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Reminder: UAAG Review Deadline Friday 31 January - Last Call Working Draft of UAAG 2.0 for browsers & other 'user agents' (Monday, 27 January)
• Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Thursday, 16 January)
• UAAG Review Deadline Extended - Last Call Working Draft of UAAG 2.0 for browsers & other 'user agents' (Tuesday, 7 January)

Steve Faulkner

• RE: implementing Canvas to assure accessibility (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)

Steve Green

• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)
• RE: HTML5 DL Element vs. WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria (Friday, 7 February)

Thomas Birch

• Captions: Understanding SC 1.2.2 (Wednesday, 26 February)

Tongue, Matt

• RE: H43 and header cell relationships (Wednesday, 19 February)
• H43 and header cell relationships (Wednesday, 19 February)

Wayne Dick

• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Success criteria speak for themselves (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Success criteria speak for themselves (Tuesday, 18 February)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2014 22:13:32 UTC