spec-prod@w3.org from April to June 2012 by author

Alexandre Bertails

Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Wednesday, 2 May)

Anne van Kesteren

Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Monday, 30 April)

Brian Kardell

Re: Spec Restyling Proposal (Monday, 2 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

Guidance on editing specs... (Thursday, 24 May)

Dan Burnett

Questions upon converting to ReSpec2 (Thursday, 17 May)

David Carlisle

Re: Shared references service (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Monday, 30 April)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Re: ReSpec: Evolution (Friday, 25 May)
Re: ReSpec: Evolution (Friday, 25 May)

Doug Schepers

Re: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Sunday, 29 April)

Eliot Graff

RE: Shared references service (Friday, 22 June)

fantasai

spec source formatting for optimum maintainability (Thursday, 17 May)
Re: Spec Restyling Proposal (Sunday, 1 April)
Spec Restyling Proposal (Sunday, 1 April)

Felix Sasaki

ReSpec question: conversion from media wiki (Wednesday, 16 May)

Florent Georges

Fwd: XMLSpec 1.14 stylesheets not accessible (Wednesday, 9 May)

Gregg Kellogg

RDF in the RDFa Core 1.1 Specification (Friday, 8 June)

Ian Jacobs

Re: Guidance on editing specs... (Friday, 25 May)

Julian Reschke

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Tuesday, 1 May)

Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Re: Spec Restyling Proposal (Monday, 2 April)

Larry Masinter

RE: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Thursday, 17 May)
RE: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
respec.js in IETF and W3C (Wednesday, 9 May)
RE: [rfc-i] FW: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
RE: Thoughts about future pubrules (Tuesday, 1 May)
RE: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Monday, 30 April)
RE: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Sunday, 29 April)
IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Sunday, 29 April)

Leif Halvard Silli

Re: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Tuesday, 1 May)
RE: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Tuesday, 1 May)
RE: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Sunday, 29 April)

Leonard Rosenthol

RE: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
RE: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)

Liam R E Quin

Re: Guidance on editing specs... (Friday, 25 May)
Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Sunday, 29 April)

Marcos Caceres

Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Tuesday, 1 May)
Re: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Sunday, 29 April)
Re: Spec Restyling Proposal (Sunday, 1 April)

Martin J. Dürst

Re: Spec Restyling Proposal (Monday, 2 April)

Paul E. Jones

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)

Paul Hoffman

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)

Philippe Le Hegaret

Thoughts about future pubrules (Monday, 30 April)

Phillip Hallam-Baker

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Friday, 11 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)

Robin Berjon

Re: Shared references service (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Shared references service (Friday, 22 June)
Shared references service (Friday, 22 June)
Re: ReSpec: Evolution (Friday, 25 May)
Re: Questions upon converting to ReSpec2 (Thursday, 24 May)
Re: Re-spec patch attached (Thursday, 24 May)
Re: respec question: not losing place during reload (Thursday, 24 May)
ReSpec: Evolution (Thursday, 24 May)
Re: respec question: not losing place during reload (Tuesday, 15 May)

Sandro Hawke

Re: respec question: not losing place during reload (Sunday, 20 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Friday, 11 May)
Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Friday, 11 May)
respec question: not losing place during reload (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Tuesday, 8 May)
Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Tuesday, 1 May)

Shane McCarron

Re: RDF in the RDFa Core 1.1 Specification (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Thoughts about future pubrules (Monday, 30 April)

Tab Atkins Jr.

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules (Sunday, 29 April)
Re: Spec Restyling Proposal (Monday, 2 April)

Travis Leithead

RE: Re-spec patch attached (Thursday, 24 May)
RE: Re-spec patch attached (Friday, 18 May)
Re-spec patch attached (Friday, 18 May)

Last message date: Monday, 25 June 2012 22:40:49 UTC