W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules

From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 12:13:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwit_98qoc-GPjS7V0yJZydem0K0SqAyCG_3My0fyPhMqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
Yes, I agree that would be very useful stuff to have when considering
a new format.

It is pretty easy to add in with HTML. Just define an XML attribute
and drop it in. It would probably be some variant of class

<p class="ABNF">

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
> On 5/9/12 6:57 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ...which means: little metadata or no metadata to rely on, right?
>> I am not sure quite what you mean there.
> A really good example I've heard is "I want to pull out all of the ABNF and
> run it through a separate tool to ensure it is correct".  Imagine similar
> markup for ASN.1 descriptions, etc.
> Metadata doesn't mean just author and publish date.
> --
> Joe Hildebrand

Website: http://hallambaker.com/
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 16:20:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:19 UTC