W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules

From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 07:20:06 -0700
Cc: rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
Message-Id: <B41073D6-01E7-459E-9197-A94C401B74D2@vpnc.org>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
On May 9, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> I note that as is often the case when the blatantly obvious is said we
> have disagreement by unresolved reference.
> 
> If you can't give a reason for a disagreement then you should probably
> think a bit before posting and wait until you can state what the
> disagreement is.

Many proposals other than "HTML as the canonical form" were made at the IETF meeting in Paris. The fact that you were not there does not mean that they were not proposed.

--Paul Hoffman
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:20:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:20:48 GMT