W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 14:09:21 +0200
Message-ID: <4FAA5E71.4040102@gmx.de>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
CC: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
On 2012-05-09 13:12, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> I note that as is often the case when the blatantly obvious is said we
> have disagreement by unresolved reference.
>
> If you can't give a reason for a disagreement then you should probably
> think a bit before posting and wait until you can state what the
> disagreement is.
>
> We have two standards bodies here. What is the reason to NOT have a
> common standard?
>
>
> BTW the only 'tools' I needed to produce W3C docs was the bit of code
> to rip out the style crud produced by Microsoft Word and another that
> produced the index.
>
> I used the same tools to produce W3C and OASIS docs.

...which means: little metadata or no metadata to rely on, right?
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 12:10:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 12:10:05 GMT