W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:11:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4FAA971A.3020405@gmx.de>
To: Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com>
CC: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
On 2012-05-09 18:03, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On 5/9/12 6:57 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker"<hallam@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>>> ...which means: little metadata or no metadata to rely on, right?
>>
>> I am not sure quite what you mean there.
>
> A really good example I've heard is "I want to pull out all of the ABNF and
> run it through a separate tool to ensure it is correct".  Imagine similar
> markup for ASN.1 descriptions, etc.
>
> Metadata doesn't mean just author and publish date.

Another one is: "I want to mechanically check that all IETF and W3C 
references are up-to-date".

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 16:11:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 16:11:46 GMT