public-rif-wg@w3.org from February 2008 by author

Adrian Giurca

• Re: BLD mini-review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: call for reviewers (Tuesday, 5 February)

Adrian Paschke

• PRD review,Part III, sections 3,4,5 (Saturday, 16 February)
• PRD review, part 2 Operational Semantics of Conditions (Saturday, 16 February)
• PRD review - Part 1 Syntax of Condition Language (Friday, 15 February)
• CFP: EuroPLop'08 Focus Group on Complex Event and Rule Patterns (Thursday, 7 February)
• AW: Minutes from January 29, 2008, telecon (Tuesday, 5 February)

Axel Polleres

• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax (Friday, 29 February)
• namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax (Friday, 29 February)
• regrets for next telecon (2008-03-04) (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: RIF F2F10 Quick Poll (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: RIF testcases API (non-normative) (Friday, 22 February)
• RIF testcases API (non-normative) (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: finalize F2F10 proposals (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... (Friday, 22 February)
• ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... (Thursday, 21 February)
• "deification" use case (Thursday, 21 February)
• ACTION-420 Review of SW-compatibility (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins (Sunday, 3 February)
• ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins (Friday, 1 February)

Boley, Harold

• RE: [Admin] No formal telecon today (but if you want to chat...) (Tuesday, 26 February)
• [BLD] Actions on Specification and Builtins (Thursday, 14 February)
• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Friday, 8 February)
• [RIF][Admin] Minutes Telecon 5 February 2008 (Tuesday, 5 February)

Chris Welty

• call for reviewers (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Fwd: my personal reply to (Re: comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG)] (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Tuesday, 5 February)

Christian de Sainte Marie

• [Admin] No formal telecon today (but if you want to chat...) (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: PRD review, part 2 Operational Semantics of Conditions (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: PRD review, part 1 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: PRD review,Part III, sections 3,4,5 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Fwd: Re: PRD review, part 2 Operational Semantics of Conditions] (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: PRD review - Part 1 Syntax of Condition Language (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: PRD review, part 1 and 2 (Monday, 18 February)
• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 19 February (Monday, 18 February)
• [F2F9] Attendees: special requirements, anyone? (Monday, 18 February)
• [F2F9] Register *now*! (If you did not yet) (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: PRD review, part 1 (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [F2F] ACTION-410 complete (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 12 February (Monday, 11 February)
• [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Minutes from January 29, 2008, telecon (Monday, 4 February)
• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon February 5 (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: F2F9 Registration Form (Friday, 1 February)

Dave Reynolds

• Re: ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 19 February (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review (Monday, 18 February)
• RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: BLD mini-review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: BLD mini-review (Monday, 18 February)
• BLD mini-review (Monday, 18 February)
• FLD mini-review (Monday, 18 February)
• Regrets: 19th Feb (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: call for reviewers (Thursday, 7 February)

Gary Hallmark

• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Thursday, 28 February)
• what does this test case entail? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: RIF test cases (Sunday, 24 February)
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• a "modest proposal" for PRD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: PRD review, part 1 (Saturday, 16 February)
• PRD review, part 2 (Saturday, 16 February)
• PRD review, part 1 (Friday, 15 February)

Hassan Aït-Kaci

• Aggregates (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD (Wednesday, 20 February)

Igor Mozetic

• Re: finalize F2F10 proposals (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: FLD review (Thursday, 14 February)
• BLD review (Wednesday, 13 February)
• FLD review (Wednesday, 13 February)

Jeff Z. Pan

• Test case query format (Friday, 22 February)
• Minutes of telecon 12/02/08 (Tuesday, 19 February)

Jos de Bruijn

• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Friday, 29 February)
• Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review (Monday, 18 February)
• Frozen version RIF RDF and OWL compatibility for F2F9 (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: Annotations and metadata in RIF (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon February 5 (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: Annotations and metadata in RIF (Friday, 1 February)
• lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Friday, 1 February)

Leora Morgenstern

• BLD review (ACTION 421) (Tuesday, 19 February)

Michael Kifer

• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: RIF test cases (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki (Saturday, 16 February)
• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki (Saturday, 16 February)
• Re: PRD review, part 2 (Saturday, 16 February)
• Re: PRD review, part 1 (Saturday, 16 February)
• Re: [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki (Saturday, 16 February)
• Re: FLD review (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: BLD review (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: FLD review (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• list constructor (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) (Tuesday, 12 February)
• FLD/BLD cleanup (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists (Friday, 8 February)
• new BLD and the framework (FLD) (Thursday, 7 February)
• the NEW BLD document (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins (Friday, 1 February)

Patrick Albert

• RE: PRD review, part 1 and 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)

Paul Vincent

• RE: a "modest proposal" for PRD (Wednesday, 20 February)

Sandro Hawke

• deliverables table (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: RIF F2F10 Quick Poll (Wednesday, 27 February)
• RIF F2F10 Quick Poll (Wednesday, 27 February)
• F2F9 Minutes - please clean up (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: RIF test cases (Sunday, 24 February)
• RIF test cases (Friday, 22 February)
• finalize F2F10 proposals (Friday, 22 February)
• reading list snapshots (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [F2F9] Register *now*! (If you did not yet) (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki (Saturday, 16 February)
• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki (Friday, 15 February)
• moving TRs to MediaWiki (Friday, 15 February)
• mediawiki "locked down" (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [BLD] Actions on Specification and Builtins (Friday, 15 February)
• F2F9 Registration Form (Friday, 1 February)

Stella Mitchell

• Comments on the 2/19 SWC doc (mostly proofreading type) (Sunday, 24 February)
• Comments on 2/19 version of RIF-FLD (Tuesday, 19 February)

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 21:44:11 UTC