W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: PRD review, part 2 Operational Semantics of Conditions

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:26:02 +0100
Message-ID: <47BB1F3A.8050601@ilog.fr>
To: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
CC: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>

Christian de Sainte Marie wrote:
> 
> Adrian Paschke wrote:
> 
>> 2.2.3.6. What does it mean in the operational semantics if we now 
>> speak of a
>> frame to be true? We have not defined that before, but defined 
>> everything in
>> terms of matching against ground values in the WM
> 
> 
> You are right: this is remant of a previous attempt that I forgot to 
> change. I will correct that for the frozen version.

Ooops. No, the text is correct (I mean, it is as intended): in the 
introduction of section 2.2.3 ATOMIC, we state that "The operational 
semantics of ATOMICs specifies the truth value of arbitrary ATOMIC with 
respect to the WM by specifying how arbitrary ATOMICs match ground 
ATOMICs: an arbitrary ATOMIC is true iff it matches a ground ATOMIC from 
the WM." Hence, the notion of the truth value of a Frame is defined.

But I agree that it might be confusing. I will repeat that matching a 
ground <whatever> means being true for each ATOMIC.

Cheers,

Christian
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 18:25:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:45 GMT