public-ldp-wg@w3.org from February 2013 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: LDP Agenda for February 25 (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: linking from resource -> container .. (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• LDP Minutes of February 25 (Monday, 25 February)
• LDP Agenda for February 25 (Friday, 22 February)
• LDP Minutes for Februart 18 (Monday, 18 February)
• LDP Agenda for February 18 (Friday, 15 February)
• LDP Scribe duty (Wednesday, 13 February)
• LDP Minutes February 11 (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 8 February)
• LDP Agenda for February 11 (Friday, 8 February)
• LDP Minutes for February 4 (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Saturday, 2 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 1 February)

Ashok Malhotra

• Re: Affordances wiki page (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size? (Thursday, 21 February)
• NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size? (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 8 February)
• Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 1 February)

Bart van Leeuwen

• Re: LDP Agenda for February 25 (Monday, 25 February)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: LDP Agenda for February 25 (Monday, 25 February)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Turtle is a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 26 February)

Henry Story

• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• HTTP headers and metadata - was: establishing conversational context (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Use-Cases for Issue-48 required (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: establishing conversational context (was: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax) (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax (Sunday, 3 February)
• Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Saturday, 2 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 1 February)
• POSTing binary data - the Atom Use Case (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Friday, 1 February)

John Arwe

• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Thursday, 28 February)
• Use case - todo for Henry from 2/18 discussion (Monday, 25 February)
• regrets for next week (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Affordances wiki page (Monday, 25 February)
• Affordances wiki page (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size? (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE-13 (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• LDP Issues Tracking Zeitgeist in Linked Data form (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: POSTing binary data - the Atom Use Case (Friday, 1 February)

Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker

• ldp-ISSUE-49 (Canonical-URI): Canonical URL - how to communicate its value to clients (Wednesday, 13 February)

Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez

• RE: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Friday, 1 February)

Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Tuesday, 5 February)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: LDP Agenda for February 4 - please read! (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)

Raúl García Castro

• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: LDP Agenda for February 18 (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Friday, 1 February)

Roger Menday

• linking from resource -> container .. (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Tuesday, 26 February)
• ISSUE-37: short description of model (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)

Serena Villata

• Re : LDP Agenda for February 18 (Sunday, 17 February)

Sergio Fernández

• Re: LDP Agenda for February 25 (Monday, 25 February)
• Fwd: Turtle is a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)

Steve Battle

• ISSUE-13 (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Saturday, 2 February)
• RE: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Friday, 1 February)

Steve Speicher

• Preparing for 2nd Public Working Draft (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: LDP Agenda for February 18 (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Thursday, 14 February)
• ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Edits made for issues 10 & 11, and other updates (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 1 February)

Wilde, Erik

• Re: Affordances wiki page (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37: short description of model (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement (Tuesday, 26 February)
• ISSUE-37 proposed text intro section (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Affordances wiki page (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size? (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)
• ISSUE-33 (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: establishing conversational context (was: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax) (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: establishing conversational context (was: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax) (Monday, 4 February)
• establishing conversational context (was: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax) (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Saturday, 2 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Saturday, 2 February)
• Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-48 (profiles): Profile mechanism is Needed [Linked Data Platform core] (Friday, 1 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2013 21:12:28 UTC