W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal

From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:50:27 +0100
Message-ID: <5110C7D3.8040902@salzburgresearch.at>
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
CC: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Hi,

On 02/02/13 00:09, Ashok Malhotra wrote:
> Hi Arnaud:
> Just to be clear, there are three proposals re. aggregation vs.
> containment:
>
> 1. Two classes of resources: containers and aggregators. When a
> container is deleted all its members
> are deleted. When an aggregator its deleted its members are not deleted.
>
> 2. One class of resource with an attribute that can be set to allow
> either container or aggregator
> behavior
>
> 3. One class of resource which contains either members or links to
> members. When a container is
> deleted all its contents are deleted. You use links to get aggregator
> behavior.
>
> You are arguing for 1. correct? I thought the WG was moving towards 3.

Not sure if we all agree, but at least IMO it is the most convenient 
solution to ISSUE-34.

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Salzburg Research
+43 662 2288 318
Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II
A-5020 Salzburg (Austria)
http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 08:51:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 May 2013 13:44:29 UTC