W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:42:47 -0500
Message-ID: <512CE607.7070208@openlinksw.com>
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 2/26/13 11:10 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> As pointed out in my mail below the current spec does not make it possible
> to post a Turtle document with relative URLs and get what one wants. 
> This is why
> I proposed that one could define a subclass of LDPCs which I called 
> intuitive
> LDPCs, that  would allow this to work correctly.
> As Sandro pointed out yesterday we are not making much progress 
> currently, probably
> because our intuitions are aligned. So this is an attempt to help us here.
> Apart from  adding this to the  best practices document one could perhaps
> define such a subclass of LDPCs in our ontology, for those that would 
> like to use them
> this would be very useful. It would follow Tim Berners Lee's suggstion 
> at the TPAC
> meeting to take relative URIs seriously.
> So it looks like there are two things this thread could lead to
>  - best practice entry
>  - ontology improvement

Please tweak the ontology. That's the best way to solve these kinds of 
intuition oriented matters.


Relative URLs are extremely important. They significantly reduce the 
cost of Linked Data deployment.



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 16:43:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:45 UTC