W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:42:47 -0500
Message-ID: <512CE607.7070208@openlinksw.com>
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 2/26/13 11:10 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> As pointed out in my mail below the current spec does not make it possible
> to post a Turtle document with relative URLs and get what one wants. 
> This is why
> I proposed that one could define a subclass of LDPCs which I called 
> intuitive
> LDPCs, that  would allow this to work correctly.
>
> As Sandro pointed out yesterday we are not making much progress 
> currently, probably
> because our intuitions are aligned. So this is an attempt to help us here.
>
> Apart from  adding this to the  best practices document one could perhaps
> define such a subclass of LDPCs in our ontology, for those that would 
> like to use them
> this would be very useful. It would follow Tim Berners Lee's suggstion 
> at the TPAC
> meeting to take relative URIs seriously.
>
> So it looks like there are two things this thread could lead to
>  - best practice entry
>  - ontology improvement

Please tweak the ontology. That's the best way to solve these kinds of 
intuition oriented matters.

Others:

Relative URLs are extremely important. They significantly reduce the 
cost of Linked Data deployment.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 16:43:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 May 2013 13:44:29 UTC