public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from June 2007: by subject

1.1. Non-text Content / Controls-Input
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
1.4.3 & 1.4.5 Contrast ratio of disabled elements
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 13 June)
2.1.1 and 2.1.2 don\'t seem to have a clear distinction
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
2.1.1. trying to cover two separate issues in one go?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
2.4.8 is not clearly differentiated from 2.4.4
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
3.1.4 SC should be AA
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Content in two languages
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: dc:lang
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Lang value length
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Liam's resources
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Missing xml:lang
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: No pointer to i18n language decl doc
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Non-English resources please
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Primary natural language
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Repeated Japanese text
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 1: H34 example source direction
- ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 2: H34 use of entities
- ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 3: H56 link to bidi primer
- ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 4: H56 incorrect link target
- Ben Caldwell (Friday, 22 June)
- ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 5: H56 source text
- ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Bidi links
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Commonness of ruby
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Description of ruby positions
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Direction of text
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: H62 Ex4 descn
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: head missing
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: je ne sais quoi
- Ben Caldwell (Friday, 22 June)
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Language tagging link
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: pr tags missing
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 in H58 tests
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 links
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 reference in tests
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: rp doesn't provide information
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Ruby resources
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Tests ignore xml:lang
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Tutorial link
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: XHTML 1.0
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: XML 1.01
- Ben Caldwell (Friday, 22 June)
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in H57 title
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in H58 title
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in tests
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2] i18n comment 2: Primary natural language
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2] i18n comment: Natural languages
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
[WCAG2] i18n comment: Provide simpler text
- Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)
\"Accessibility Supported\" awkward sentence
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Accessibility Supported\" comma and small change
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"all\" of the following requirements CAN\'T be met, as depends on chosen level
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Authoring tools\" section has been removed
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
\"Contrast ratio\" definition and user-selected colours
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"human language\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"idioms\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Interruptions\" may warrant a higher priority
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"keyboard interface\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"large scale\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)
\"machine-readable metadata\" preferred...but do UAs support it?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Non-Interference\" \"No Keyboard Trap\" dependend on UA/plugin as well
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"non-text content\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)
\"Optional components...\" meta-data reference, pt 2
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Optional components...\" typo and awkward sentence
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Programmatically Determined\" addition to last sentence
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Programmatically Determined\" awkward sentence
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Web Page\" definition
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Web Page\" definition and user agents
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\"Web Page\" definition and user agents, pt 2
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
\'Description of the URI\' does not map well to a \'product\'
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
A new Success Criterion regarding use of color.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
A, AA, AAA criteria
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
about \"Accessibility Supported\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Accessible Technology
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Add definition of testability to Guidelines (Introduction & Glossary)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Add Exception to 3.1.1
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
Add video-clips to illustrate solutions
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Adding \"at least\" to second sentances of 1.4.3 & 1.4.5
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 18 June)
Addition of a related resource
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Addition to \"Accessibility-Supported Technologies\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Addition to \"Creating your own list...\" section.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
An advisory on anti-aliased fonts.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Apologetic whining in \"Sufficient Techniques\" explanation
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
AT heavy \"levels of conformance\" bullet points
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Automatic testing
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Awkward and incomplete wording
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Awkward wording for new technologies bit
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Awkward wording on confomance level
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Awkwkard non-word \"turnon\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Ban hiding link text
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)
better but still dommageable concept
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
bullet 2, \"checked\", seems unnecessary
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Can CSS colour be classed as \"programmatically determined\"?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Change alternative number two \"Checked\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Clarification of Text, image of text, and visually randered text
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 6 June)
Clarification on Conformance Requirements for Alternative Content
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Clarify 2.4.4 by adding \"taken together\" or \"together with\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
Clearly identify supplemental content or alternate version
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Comma and \"but\" in \"Advisory Techniques\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Comment LC-1020
- Loretta Guarino Reid (Sunday, 24 June)
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1021
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1022
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1023
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1024
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1026
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1027
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1028
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1029
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1030
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1031
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1032
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1033
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Comment LC-1034
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1037
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1038
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1039
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1040
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1041
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1042
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1044
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1047
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Comment LC-1051
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Wednesday, 27 June)
Comment LC-1052
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Wednesday, 27 June)
Comment LC-1053
- Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Wednesday, 27 June)
comment on responses to comments on WCAG 2.0 27 April 2006 draft
- Johannes Koch (Wednesday, 6 June)
comments and issues on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/
- Lisa Seeman (Thursday, 28 June)
Comments on WCAG 2.0 Draft of May 2007
- Martin Stehle (Wednesday, 6 June)
Comments on WCAG 2.0 Guidelines
- srush@knowbility.org (Saturday, 30 June)
comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 - response to WG
- Loretta Guarino Reid (Wednesday, 6 June)
- Andrew Arch (Wednesday, 6 June)
Comments on WCAG 2.0 WD, 17 May 2007
- Matt Morgan-May (Friday, 29 June)
common failure and Sufficient Techniques matching
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Confusing linkage between documents
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
confussion with non-live audio/video
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
Consider this technique for 2.4.1
- Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)
Contents ordering is odd
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
contextual alternative
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)
contextual caption and summary
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)
contrast ratio SC level
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Contrast value and background problem
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)
ddncofhbvk
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
Definition of \"Mechanism\" needs clarification
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Definition of \"Technology\" should be changed to allow synchronization with AUWG\'s definition of \"content type\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
Definition of the wider range of people
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 20 June)
Defintion of \"programmatically determined link context\" refers to \"sentence\".
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
direct context or DOM context
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Does HTML using pt or px meet this with today\'s user agents?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Does video with synchronized captions fit into 1.2?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
doing a little more for people with cognitive limitations
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Editorial
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
elevator safety code violations ---IHS
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
EOWG new comments on WCAG 2.0 17 May 2007 Working Draft
- Judy Brewer (Saturday, 30 June)
Eric Hansen comments on WCAG 2
- Hansen, Eric (Saturday, 30 June)
Eric Hansen reaction to WCAG 2.0 WG responses to Eric's comments on the 2006 working draft
- Hansen, Eric (Wednesday, 6 June)
Example in the intent for change of context is not a change of context
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 18 June)
Exceptions for single words and other classes of words
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
Frame technique promote old fashion web
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
Fwd: Fwd: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006
- Loretta Guarino Reid (Monday, 18 June)
Fwd: Reminder - request for response on WCAG 2.0 comments
- Loretta Guarino Reid (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Loretta Guarino Reid (Wednesday, 6 June)
Fwd: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006
- Judy Brewer (Saturday, 16 June)
General
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Good job done
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
Grounds for \"200%\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Guideline 1.3
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Guideline 2.2
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Guideline does not mention the need for equivalent alternatives (only SC).
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Guidelines, not requirements?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
H1-H6, Leval A or AAA?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Handling non-conformance of one of many pages in a product
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Headings as AA
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
How does \"I accept this license agreement\" type operation conform
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)
How to measure dB(A) SPL and Tools
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Human testers should always be persons with disabilities
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
IBM Comments to WCAG 2 May 17 Working Draft
- Andrew LaHart (Friday, 29 June)
in practice, difference between \"blink\" and \"flash\" still unclear, even with appendix
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Include criterion 3.1.5 in levels A and AA
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Inconsistent treatment of null content
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
Inconsistent treatment of null content (2)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
Increase SC for 3.3.4
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Interface Design
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Intro to the four principles
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Invalide test procedure
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
just \"in text\"?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
just \"people with disabilities\"?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
just \"users with disabilities\"?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
just \"visually\" evident?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
just applicable to \"instructions\"?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Keep 2.4.4 as a Level-A Success Criterion.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Lack of attention to the deaf people needs.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 10 June)
lang in attribut
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Layout using CSS
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
LC-1043
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Let the user use her preferred format for input
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Level of priority
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
level of this success criterion
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)
Limits on user controlled timed events
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Limts on pronunciations
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Links give context
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)
Links give context - CORRECTION
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 16 June)
mclawuoouc
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
mechanism, or should it be \"programmatically determined\", or both?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Mention of the Microsoft Word Readability Formulas
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
missing information on common failures
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)
more ergonomic problem than accessibility problem
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Multimedia and Video confusion
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
No provision for link highlighting
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 7 June)
Not clear that it\'s ok to provide directions once for a site.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Not clear whether web pages should use W3C technologies
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 8 June)
Notes 1 and 2 on the Assistive Technology Definition
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
only 9 pages long
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Overview content tweak
- Craig Francis (Saturday, 16 June)
Page title as context
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)
Please choose your side, UA bug or not ?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)
Please Remove the \"Testability\" Requirement
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
prerecorded or pre-recorded?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Present more techiques on how improve texts
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Prohibiting images of important text
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Rationale for \"200%\" and 50%?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Readability is broken
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Reading level changed to primary education level
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
reclassing it from AAA to A
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Referencing User Agents and Assistive Technologies
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Reminder - request for response on WCAG 2.0 comments
- Alastair Campbell (Friday, 8 June)
- Shawn Henry (Friday, 8 June)
- Judy Brewer (Friday, 8 June)
- Alexandre Alapetite (Wednesday, 6 June)
Reminder -- request for response on WCAG 2.0 comments
- Arun (Thursday, 21 June)
Remove testability requirements
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
Replace example 4
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Replace term \"visually rendered\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Requirement for \'7.) Full Pages\' may be too narrow
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
resized without AT
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
resized without AT (same issue as my comment to 1.4.4)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
resizing of form controls
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Respecting OS keyboard accessibility features
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Response from Jon Gunderson on Comment 1
- Jon Gunderson (Wednesday, 6 June)
Response from Jon Gunderson on Comment 2
- Jon Gunderson (Wednesday, 6 June)
Response from Jon Gunderson on Comment 3 and 4
- Jon Gunderson (Wednesday, 6 June)
Responsible for \"200%\" and 50%\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Rewording 1.1 slightly to include pure text, and a comma
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
SC 2.4.1: use of term "block of content"
- Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)
SC 2.4.8 should be at higher level
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
SC level for 3.1.3
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
SCR21: Using functions of the Document Object Model (DOM) to add content to a page
- Maciej Jaros (Thursday, 7 June)
Should 2.4.9 be a AA requirement?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
Should Icons be included in contrast requirements?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Should prohibit \"relies upon scripting\"
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 8 June)
Significant improvement over previous drafts.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Site listed in resources appears to have some issues
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
Skip links are not required to be visible (G1)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Sound Volume Control
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Stray comma
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Stray comma and \"standard\"?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Stronger statement about accessibility for people with cognitive disability
- Sandra Vassallo (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Success Criterion score
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Suggested additional qualification
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
Symbols illustrating texts can be ignored by assistive technology
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
teastability
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
techniques document review
- Lisa Seeman (Thursday, 28 June)
Techniques for WCAG 2: F42
- Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)
- Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)
Testability
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Testability is dramatically hurting the WCAG
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
Testing comment form (please ignore)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 6 June)
Testing for everything is unworkable.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
Text resizing
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Thanks for the reply
- Shibu (Wednesday, 6 June)
The parenthetical phrase is confusing
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
The phrasing of this SC is not definitive enough
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
The presentation is unnecessarily difficult.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
The relationship between labels and names is not clear enough.
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
the SC should be applicable even on a single page
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
This SC is at a level that will not be adopted by many sites – it is too important to leave at “AAA”
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Time Limit for Access Control
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Time Limit for Security
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Time Limit for Security/Access Control
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
too vague
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
Transcript = text allows no captions
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Transcripts not given adequate relevance
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Trying to help readability
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 9 June)
UA bug on object
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)
Use alternative versions only when necessary
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Use heading for different columns in web page layouts?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Use Headings as well as make them meaningful
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Use of color information for contextual distinction
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)
Use of wmode
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
user agent detection
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 9 June)
viewing size of non-text content without alternatives
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)
W3C Process and WCAG 2.0 Public Working Draft 17/05/07
- William Loughborough (Saturday, 16 June)
- Judy Brewer (Saturday, 16 June)
- Ian B. Jacobs (Friday, 15 June)
- William Loughborough (Friday, 15 June)
- Charles McCathieNevile (Thursday, 14 June)
- Lisa Seeman (Thursday, 14 June)
- Liddy Nevile (Wednesday, 13 June)
- ~:'' ありがとうございました。 (Tuesday, 12 June)
WCAG 2 reads well
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
- David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 June)
WCAG-WG's response to comments
- Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 6 June)
What about non-visually evident?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
What does \"accessibility support\" mean?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Which sc covers frame names?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
whole SC seems unnecessary
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Why \"18 point or 14 point bold\"?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Why \"Documented lists\" needed?
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
Why is Sign Language not required on non-multimedia
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)
Wording - \"easier\" (than what?)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
Wording not explicit enough, and too similar to 2.4.4
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)
Wording suggests that a link context is required
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)
wrong sucess criteria association
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...]
- Al Gilman (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Al Gilman (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)
- Al Gilman (Friday, 22 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006
- Shawn Henry (Friday, 29 June)
- Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)
- Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)
- Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)
- Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)
- Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)
- Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)
- Andi Snow-Weaver (Monday, 11 June)
- Jim Thatcher (Thursday, 7 June)
- Greg Gay (Friday, 8 June)
- Kiyochika Nakamura (Friday, 8 June)
- Maciej Jaros (Thursday, 7 June)
- Wayne Dick (Wednesday, 6 June)
- Jason Gottshall (Wednesday, 6 June)
- William Loughborough (Wednesday, 6 June)
- Christophe Strobbe (Wednesday, 6 June)
- Lachlan Hunt (Tuesday, 5 June)
- Bailey Bruce (Tuesday, 5 June)
- Loretta Guarino Reid (Tuesday, 5 June)
- Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 1 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (1 of 2)
- Judy Brewer (Saturday, 30 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (1 of 3)
- Greg Lowney (Friday, 29 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (1 of 8)
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (2 of 8)
- Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (Issue ID: LC-712)
- Jaakko.Vilen@nordea.com (Thursday, 7 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (n of 4)]
- Al Gilman (Sunday, 17 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft...]
- Al Gilman (Friday, 22 June)
Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...]
- Al Gilman (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)
- Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from June 2007 by subject