Contents ordering is odd

Name: Philip Naylor
Email: P.J.Naylor@bristol.ac.uk
Affiliation: University of Bristol
Document: TD
Item Number: (none selected)
Part of Item: Applicability
Comment Type: editorial
Summary of Issue: Contents ordering is odd
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
Reading the document as a standalone item, the (alphabetical) contents ordering seems odd - especially since it\'s the \"Techniques and Failures\" document, not \"Failures and Techniques\".

Proposed Change:
I would suggest reordering the content as:



1. General Techniques

2. HTML Techniques

3. CSS Techniques

4. Server-side Techniques

5. Client-side Techniques

6. SMIL Techniques

7. ARIA Techniques

8. Plain Text Techniques

9. Common Failures