comment on responses to comments on WCAG 2.0 27 April 2006 draft

Hi,

this is a response to 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007May/0063.html>.

About your response to my comment 1:

> SC 4.1.2 and SC 1.1.1 require that form controls have names. The name
> may be provided in a way that is not a (visible) label.

So I assume that not "naming" a form control is a failure, right? Should 
this be made explicit by creating a common failure?


I'm OK with your responses to my comments 2 and 3 :-)
-- 
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
                             (Te Deum, 4th cent.)