Name: Patrick H. Lauke Email: redux@splintered.co.uk Affiliation: Document: W2 Item Number: Success Criterion 3.3.6 Part of Item: Comment Type: technical Summary of Issue: bullet 2, \"checked\", seems unnecessary Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): \"Checked: Submitted data is checked for input errors before going on to the next step in the process.\" The concept of checking for errors sounds to me like a common application design tenet, not an accessibility one. Also, why should the app check for errors before moving on to the next step? Would a final screen saying \"there were errors in steps 3 and 5, here are the fields for you to edit\" or similar not work as well? Proposed Change: Bullet 2 seems unnecessary, or requires better wording.Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 18:40:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 March 2009 12:11:57 GMT