- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Cynthia Shelly Email: cyns@microsoft.com Affiliation: Microsoft Document: W2 Item Number: Guideline 2.4: Provide ways to help users with disabilities navigate... Part of Item: Comment Type: technical Summary of Issue: Which sc covers frame names? Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): A collegue thought that frame names should be covered under 2.4 rather than 4.1. Many people may not think of frames as UI elements, and might not be able to find them. Proposed Change: Is there anything we can do to make it more clear that frames are covered under 4.1.2?
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 01:15:44 UTC