www-validator@w3.org from May 2001 by date

Thursday, 31 May 2001

• Checked site crashes Netscape Jochem Heicke
• Re: Dubious validator error. Validator bug or what ? Liam Quinn
• Re: broken images chris garaffa

Wednesday, 30 May 2001

• RE: broken images Thanasis Kinias
• Re: broken images Kathleen Anderson
• Re: broken images Bjoern Hoehrmann
• broken images David Paxson
• Re: Dubious validator error. Validator bug or what ? Christian Smith
• Dubious validator error. Validator bug or what ? sysadmin
• Re: "target=" in Strict DTD Nick Kew
• Re: "target=" in Strict DTD Brian Gilkison
• "target=" in Strict DTD Glyn Williams
• UK Govt Posts IE only portal site mike

Tuesday, 29 May 2001

• Re: Mimetype: application/xhtml+xml -- add to validator? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: checklink.pl fails: missing sys/syscall.ph? Karr, David
• Re: Mimetype: application/xhtml+xml -- add to validator? Gray Little Teddy Bear
• Re: Mimetype: application/xhtml+xml -- add to validator? Terje Bless

Saturday, 26 May 2001

• Mimetype: application/xhtml+xml -- add to validator? Alexander J. Vincent

Monday, 28 May 2001

• Re: Newbie - is this a bug Terje Bless
• Newbie - is this a bug Allan Smith

Sunday, 27 May 2001

• Re: Doctype Terje Bless
• A few updates (was: several fixes) Terje Bless
• Re: Charset Trouble Terje Bless
• Re: checklink.pl fails: missing sys/syscall.ph? Terje Bless
• Re: Validator for Windows NT/2000 System Terje Bless

Saturday, 26 May 2001

• Re: Validator for Windows NT/2000 System Terje Bless
• Validator for Windows NT/2000 System Kristian Fiskerstrand

Friday, 25 May 2001

• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Lloyd Wood

Thursday, 24 May 2001

• Re: HTML Validator Einar Westermann

Friday, 25 May 2001

• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Sofia Lauffs
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Liam Quinn

Thursday, 24 May 2001

• [Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML] Brian Kavanaugh
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML JohnTNYC
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML JohnTNYC
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Nick Kew
• RE: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• RE: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Thanasis Kinias
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML jason r tibbetts
• Re: Doctype and Netscape 6 todd fahrner

Wednesday, 23 May 2001

• Shaming compaines into improving their HTML William Sheppard

Tuesday, 22 May 2001

• Doctype and Netscape 6 Tomislav Grabic

Monday, 21 May 2001

• bad host name(?) but sites available? Thom Haslam
• HTML Validator JMWhitmire@aol.com

Thursday, 24 May 2001

• Re: Reissuing 'Character Set' Note? Re: Betterinternationalization of validator Dan Connolly
• Re: Better internationalization of validator Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Better internationalization of validator Martin Duerst

Wednesday, 23 May 2001

• Reissuing 'Character Set' Note? Re: Better internationalization of validator Martin Duerst
• Re: Better internationalization of validator Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Validating HTML 4.01 Strict with an embedded Java Applet? Thanasis Kinias
• Validating HTML 4.01 Strict with an embedded Java Applet? Carole A. Gay
• Re: Adding new Doctype Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Adding new Doctype Terje Bless
• Adding new Doctype Martin Duerst
• Re: Modified normalize_newlines to work on PC and Mac, too. Terje Bless
• Re: Modified normalize_newlines to work on PC and Mac, too. Martin Duerst
• Re: Modified normalize_newlines to work on PC and Mac, too. Terje Bless
• Modified normalize_newlines to work on PC and Mac, too. Martin Duerst

Tuesday, 22 May 2001

• Re: Better internationalization of validator Martin Duerst
• Re: Better internationalization of validator Peter K. Sheerin
• Re: Better internationalization of validator Terje Bless
• Re: Better internationalization of validator Martin Duerst

Monday, 21 May 2001

• Re: Better internationalization of validator Terje Bless
• Re: False error report by checklink (was: checklink:) Tim Bagot
• False error report by checklink (was: checklink:) Michael Bowen
• checklink: Michael Bowen
• Better internationalization of validator Martin Duerst

Thursday, 17 May 2001

• Erratum: absent encoding declaration (was: Re: CSS validator stricter than XML validator) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: checklink stalled Hugo Haas

Wednesday, 16 May 2001

• Re: 'html 2.0 transitional'? Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 15 May 2001

• Re: CSS validator stricter than XML validator Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: CSS validator stricter than XML validator Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: XHTML 1 Strict , element "input" not allowed here Liam Quinn
• XHTML 1 Strict , element "input" not allowed here lists

Monday, 14 May 2001

• Re: Charset Trouble Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: checklink stalled Nick Kew
• checklink.pl fails: missing sys/syscall.ph? David M. Karr
• Re: checklink stalled Terje Bless

Saturday, 12 May 2001

• Doctype drcarothers

Friday, 11 May 2001

• 'html 2.0 transitional'? Max Bell
• Charset Trouble Parker D. Smith

Monday, 14 May 2001

• Re: checklink stalled Hugo Haas

Saturday, 12 May 2001

• Re: CSS validator stricter than XML validator Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 10 May 2001

• checklink: Stefania Manzi

Wednesday, 9 May 2001

• dead link Mike Pastor

Thursday, 10 May 2001

• Re: CSS validator stricter than XML validator Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Is the CSS validator broken? Philippe Le Hegaret

Wednesday, 9 May 2001

• Re: Is the CSS validator broken? Terje Bless
• Re: Is the CSS validator broken? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: result for my page. Tangina Barrows
• Re: result for my page. Brian Gilkison

Tuesday, 8 May 2001

• result for my page. Mikko Hyppönen

Wednesday, 9 May 2001

• Re: iso-8859-1-Windows-3.1-Latin-1 Terje Bless
• Re: iso-8859-1-Windows-3.1-Latin-1 Liam Quinn
• Re: iso-8859-1-Windows-3.1-Latin-1 Terje Bless
• RE: iso-8859-1-Windows-3.1-Latin-1 Thanasis Kinias
• Re: iso-8859-1-Windows-3.1-Latin-1 Terje Bless

Tuesday, 8 May 2001

• RE: iso-8859-1-Windows-3.1-Latin-1 Thanasis Kinias
• RE: iso-8859-1-Windows-3.1-Latin-1 Terje Bless
• Re: [www-validator] <none> Terje Bless
• Re: Suggestion for xhtml/html validation service Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Wrong behaviour of validator ? Terje Bless
• Re: Suggestion for xhtml/html validation service Terje Bless
• Re: checksum error on validator.tar.gz, SUN Terje Bless

Sunday, 6 May 2001

• checksum error on validator.tar.gz, SUN David Theilen

Friday, 4 May 2001

• Suggestion for xhtml/html validation service Nathan Miller
• Wrong behaviour of validator ? Philippe Deschamp

Saturday, 5 May 2001

• Re: Batch Checking of HTML Files Liam Quinn
• Re: Batch Checking of HTML Files Tomasz Jantczak

Thursday, 3 May 2001

• [www-validator] <none> Flint, Erick

Wednesday, 2 May 2001

• Re: checklink: http://www.nationalgeographic.com/maps/ Nick Kew
• checklink: http://www.nationalgeographic.com/maps/ Joseph Eisenberg

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2001 17:48:59 UTC