- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@bertilo.se.fm>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:36:31 +0200
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Philippe Le Hegaret:
> The following sentence in the same section is misleading:
> [[
> It is also a fatal error if an XML entity contains no encoding declaration
> and its content is not legal UTF-8 or UTF-16.
> ]]
>
> and should read:
>
> "Unless an encoding is determined by a higher-level protocol, it is also a fatal
> error if an XML entity contains no encoding declaration and its content is not
> legal UTF-8 or UTF-16."
I truely hope that interpretation is correct, since that could ease
a few compatibily issues with XHTML. As things stand now, I have to
include an xml declaration (with encoding info) in those of my XHTML
documents that are not in UTF-8. But that gives a few old browsers
a head ache. Now, if the new interpretation holds, I just have to
make sure the server sends out the correct charset info in the
http header, and I'm home free. But will the validators go along?
--
#################################################################
Bertilo Wennergren
<http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
<bertilow@bertilo.se.fm>
#################################################################
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 15:45:28 UTC