Thursday, 28 June 2001
Wednesday, 27 June 2001
- Re: cycles in rdfs:subClassOf, cyc gels, extensionality of classes
- Re: cycles in rdfs:subClassOf, cyc gels, extensionality of classes
- cycles in rdfs:subClassOf, cyc gels, extensionality of classes
- Re: cycles in rdfs:subClassOf, cyc gels, extensionality of classes
- cycles in rdfs:subClassOf, cyc gels, extensionality of classes
- Re: Can DAML class also be an instance?
- Re: Can DAML class also be an instance?
- Can DAML class also be an instance?
Monday, 25 June 2001
Sunday, 24 June 2001
- Re: DAML+OIL bug (namespace vs baseuri)
- RDF reification is syntax was RE: one line RDF abstract syntax.
- RE: one line RDF abstract syntax. was RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
Friday, 22 June 2001
- Re: one line RDF abstract syntax. was RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- Re: one line RDF abstract syntax. was RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
Saturday, 23 June 2001
Friday, 22 June 2001
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- Re: one line RDF abstract syntax. was RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- Re: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- one line RDF abstract syntax. was RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- Re: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
Thursday, 21 June 2001
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- RE: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- RE: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
- DAML+OIL bug (namespace vs baseuri)
Wednesday, 20 June 2001
- Re: Inference in daml
- RE: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: Inference in daml
- RE: Reification as nesting
Tuesday, 19 June 2001
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
Monday, 18 June 2001
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: Inference in daml
Sunday, 17 June 2001
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: T&A Boxes (was: RE: rdf as a base for other languages)
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: Inference in daml
- Re: Inference in daml
- Inference in daml
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
Saturday, 16 June 2001
Friday, 15 June 2001
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
Thursday, 14 June 2001
- Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1
- Re: T&A Boxes (was: RE: rdf as a base for other languages)
- Re: T&A Boxes (was: RE: rdf as a base for other languages)
Wednesday, 13 June 2001
- Re: T&A Boxes (was: RE: rdf as a base for other languages)
- Re: T&A Boxes (was: RE: rdf as a base for other languages)
Tuesday, 12 June 2001
- T&A Boxes (was: RE: rdf as a base for other languages)
- RE: definition/assertion (WAS rdf as a base for other languages)
- Re: About rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics
- About rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics
Monday, 11 June 2001
Sunday, 10 June 2001
- A proposed solution to the RDF syntactic/semantic mapping problem (long)
- Re: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data
Saturday, 9 June 2001
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Reification as nesting
- more N-triples (Was RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells)
- RE: definition/assertion (WAS rdf as a base for other languages)
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: Absolute Truth -vs- relative truth
Friday, 8 June 2001
Saturday, 9 June 2001
Friday, 8 June 2001
- Re: Nests and abstract syntax: Quads vs. nests as sets of Triples
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: Reification as nesting
- [www-rdf-logic] <none>
- RE: definition/assertion (WAS rdf as a base for other languages)
- Re: Absolute Truth -vs- relative truth
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Post-doc position at Lyon University
- RE: Absolute Truth -vs- relative truth
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- RE: definition/assertion (WAS rdf as a base for other languages)
- Absolute Truth -vs- relative truth
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: Nests and abstract syntax: Quads vs. nests as sets of Triples
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Nests and abstract syntax: Quads vs. nests as sets of Triples
- Re: Nests and abstract syntax: Quads vs. nests as sets of Triples
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: performatives and trust
Thursday, 7 June 2001
- RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- larch idiom for definitions: "converts" [was: rdf as a base]
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- RE: properties with classes as values?
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- Re: properties with classes as values?
- Re: Reification as nesting
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Reification as nesting [off-topic humour]
- properties with classes as values?
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
Wednesday, 6 June 2001
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Nests and abstract syntax: Quads vs. nests as sets of Triples
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Nests and abstract syntax: Quads vs. nests as sets of Triples
- Nests and abstract syntax: Quads vs. nests as sets of Triples
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: Reification as nesting
Thursday, 7 June 2001
Wednesday, 6 June 2001
- Re: Reification as nesting
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Cheap memory [was RE: rdf as a base for other languages]
- Re: Cheap memory [was RE: rdf as a base for other languages]
- Re: Reification as nesting
Tuesday, 5 June 2001
- Reification as nesting
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Agents: Speech or Borg (was RE: performatives and trust)
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Building on RDF
- [Fwd: rdf as a base for other languages]
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Cheap memory [was RE: rdf as a base for other languages]
- Cheap memory [was RE: rdf as a base for other languages]
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: Proposal for extensional representation of statements.
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
Monday, 4 June 2001
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: performatives and trust
- Re: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Proposal for extensional representation of statements.
Tuesday, 5 June 2001
Monday, 4 June 2001
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
Tuesday, 5 June 2001
Monday, 4 June 2001
Tuesday, 5 June 2001
Sunday, 3 June 2001
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
Saturday, 2 June 2001
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Everything That Linguistist Have Always Wanted To Know about Logic*
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Circles and arrows diagrams using stylesheet rules
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
Friday, 1 June 2001
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Building on RDF
- Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Building on RDF
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Building on RDF
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Honda exists? (was:rdf as a base for other languages)
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...]
- performatives and trust
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- RE: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: RDF model revisited, or: How to make the most out of Reifications and Containers
- facts and semantics was: Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples
- rdf as a base for other languages
- Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object
- RE: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reificat ion: rdf:predicate/subject/object
Thursday, 31 May 2001
Friday, 1 June 2001
- RE: Change the subject line (was: What do the ontologists want)
- Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object
- Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object
- Re: RDF model revisited, or: How to make the most out of Reifications and Containers