- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- cc: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, pat hayes wrote:
[..]
> Maybe we should stick to using RDF as a simple ground-data language,
> and just build or use something else altogether for doing more
> complicated stuff.
Shove in a version number ("RDF 1.0") and that's pretty much my view. For
simple ground-data, the node'n'arc stuff's really handy, but it is painful
to watch the contortions people have to go through when they decide to
represent everything and anything as RDF 1.0 triples.
> Pat
Dan
Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 12:27:53 UTC