- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:12:28 +0100
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
At 08:02 AM 6/22/01 -0700, Seth Russell wrote:
>From: "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
>
> > Then, we can say that under this interpretation the RDF graph containing
> > the first statement can be seen as representing a truth, and the graph
> > containing the second statement as representing a falsity. This is what I
> > mean by appearing 'true' or 'false'.
>
>I have trouble with you use of the word "represents" here. It seems as
>though you are using it in a manner such that the range of 'represents' is
>the set of values {true, false}.
Ahem. The phrase I used was "represents a truth", not "represents [the
value] true".
"A truth", I think, could be much more than just the value "true".
#g
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 12:48:10 UTC