- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:04:12 +0100 (BST)
- To: "Geoff Chappell" <geoff@sover.net>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
On June 17, Geoff Chappell writes: > Hi folks, > > I've been working with expressing inference rules in daml and need a little help/feedback. > > It seems that rules with just the subject unbound can be expressed easily. > > For example the rule: > type(X,animal)<-type(X,dog) > can be expressed as: > type(X,animal) or not(type(X,dog)) > or in daml: It seems to me that all you are saying here is that dog is a subClassOf animal. What is wrong with <daml:Class rdf:ID="dog"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#animal"/> </daml:Class> Am I missing something? Ian
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2001 18:11:39 UTC