- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 20:54:08 +0100
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: jborden@mediaone.net, las@olin.edu, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> > I really really don't mean to _assert_ that the diagnosis is one in that > > particular list. > > > > What I do wish to assert is the <if> expression. The problem with RDF as it > > is currently defined (statement == triple == fact) is that I cannot assert > > an expression created of multiple statements (i.e. a subgraph) apparently > > without asserting each of the subgraphs within the subgraph. > > (repeating Dan Connolly yesterday...) > > This seems to be a common myth. Where in the current definition of > RDF does it say that you cannot describe (mention) a triple without > asserting (using) it? > > (I wont be shocked if it does say it somewhere -- I'm not fond of the > current REC -- but I would love a pointer if you happen to know where > it says this.) I couldn't find one, only http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#changes says 14-November-1997: Further refinement, especially regarding assertions -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2001 14:54:32 UTC