www-html@w3.org from February 2002 by date

Friday, 1 March 2002

RE: src attribute of IFRAME and FRAME Brian Bober

Thursday, 28 February 2002

RE: Ads masquerading as OS messages [was: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?!] Jon Haworth

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

Re[2]: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! Monostory Miklós

Thursday, 28 February 2002

Re: Deprecated stuff in XHTML1.1 (was: Re: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?!) Peter Sheerin
Deprecated stuff in XHTML1.1 (was: Re: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?!) Erich Reto Iseli
Re: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! timeless

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

RE: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! Jon Haworth
Re: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! timeless

Tuesday, 26 February 2002

Concise list of active modules in XHTML 1.1? Peter Sheerin
Re: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! Thomas Hurst
Re: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! Joe Kaczmarek
Re: Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Jonas Jørgensen

Monday, 25 February 2002

Re: Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Joanne Hunter
Re: usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! Sean B. Palmer

Tuesday, 26 February 2002

Re: Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Thomas Hurst

Monday, 25 February 2002

usemap in XHTML 1.1 no longer a URI?! Peter Sheerin
Re: lowercase XML languages Frank Boumphrey
Re: Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Peter Sheerin
Re: Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Frank Tobin
Re: lowercase XML languages Timothy J. Luoma
Re: Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Ben Bucksch
Re: Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Frank Tobin
Re: W3C uri: /MarkUp William F. Hammond
RE: Why bother? Jelks Cabaniss

Sunday, 24 February 2002

Target, or opening a new instance of UA with a link Doug M-C

Monday, 25 February 2002

Re: Why bother? Andrew McFarland

Sunday, 24 February 2002

Re: lowercase XML languages Matthew D. Fuller
Re: Why bother? W A S S E R C R A T S
Re: lowercase XML languages Dave Hodder
Re: lowercase XML languages Christian Smith
lowercase XML languages Robert Koberg
Re: Why bother? Ben Bucksch
Re: Why bother? Jan Roland Eriksson
Re: Why bother? Frank Tobin
Re: Why bother? Simon Hill
Re: Why bother? Robert Koberg
Why bother? Jelks Cabaniss

Friday, 22 February 2002

Re: Perhaps a bug in XHTML Mod DTDs? Processing instructions may not contain ":" Masayasu Ishikawa
Perhaps a bug in XHTML Mod DTDs? Processing instructions may not contain ":" Christian Wolfgang Hujer
RE: Why is neither an OBJECT or an EMBED tag capable of playing MP3's James Wilkinson

Thursday, 21 February 2002

Re: Including the DTD for HTML TABLE (from strict html dtd) in my own dtd Russell O'Connor

Wednesday, 20 February 2002

Why is neither an OBJECT or an EMBED tag capable of playing MP3's Baiss Eric Magnusson
Validation error: "Modularization of XHTML" Section E.4.1 example Niranjan Kundapur

Friday, 15 February 2002

Including the DTD for HTML TABLE (from strict html dtd) in my own dtd GEOFF DUCK

Wednesday, 20 February 2002

RE: cross-browser standards for <object> tag? James Wilkinson

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

cross-browser standards for <object> tag? Peter Sheerin

Monday, 18 February 2002

Re: structure or presentation? Jonny Axelsson
Question about the urlencoded form data which charset is UTF-16 Hiroyuki Okamoto - 岡本　浩之

Sunday, 17 February 2002

RE: Empty script tags cause trouble. Jelks Cabaniss
Re: Empty script tags cause trouble. Masayasu Ishikawa

Saturday, 16 February 2002

Re: Empty script tags cause trouble. William F. Hammond
Re: structure or presentation? William F. Hammond
Re: Empty script tags cause trouble. Thomas Hurst
Re: Empty script tags cause trouble. Christian Wolfgang Hujer
RE: Empty script tags cause trouble. Jelks Cabaniss

Friday, 15 February 2002

RE: structure or presentation? Jelks Cabaniss
Empty script tags cause trouble. Edwin van Vliet
Re: structure or presentation? Jamal Mavadat
Re: HR: structure or presentation? Shinichi Matsui

Thursday, 14 February 2002

Re: HR: structure or presentation? Frank Tobin
Re: HR: structure or presentation? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
Re: HR: structure or presentation? Marc Attinasi
HR: structure or presentation? Joe Kaczmarek
AW: Input Type=file default Value Tanev Robert
Re: Input Type=file default Value Christian Wolfgang Hujer
Re: Input Type=file default Value Andrew Clover
Input Type=file default Value Tanev Robert

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

Re: FIELDSET, LEGEND, HTML, & XHTML Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: XHTML 1.1 with namespaces enabled? (PR#651) Steven Pemberton
Re: FIELDSET, LEGEND, HTML, & XHTML Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

Re: FIELDSET, LEGEND, HTML, & XHTML Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: W3C uri: /MarkUp Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: Fw: Fw: Stop your forwarder Jonas Jørgensen
Re: html to pdf conversion Christian Wolfgang Hujer
html to pdf conversion phantom kr
HTML/XHTML or Morals and Viruses Vix

Monday, 11 February 2002

RE: I am very sorry, but help yourself to help me Murray Macdonald
/kick +b "e.richards@clear.net.nz" FW-Driver-OS-Net SW devdrvr.net
RE: src attribute of IFRAME and FRAME Benjamin D. Gray
Re: src attribute of IFRAME and FRAME Philippe Le Hegaret
I am very sorry, but help yourself to help me Eric
Re: WAKE UP YOUR IDEAS Zach Kenyon
WAKE UP YOUR IDEAS Eric
Java FW-Driver-OS-Net SW devdrvr.net
W3C uri: /MarkUp William F. Hammond
Re: Fw: Stop your forwarder Philip TAYLOR
Fw: Fw: Stop your forwarder Eric

Sunday, 10 February 2002

Fw: Stop your forwarder Eric
Fw: Let me know if I should add in more information Eric
Fw: Let me know if I should add in more information Eric
Fw: Fw: Eric
Fw: Let me know if I should add in more information Eric
Re: Fw: Darren Ferguson
Let me know if I should add in more information Eric
(no subject) Eric
Re: FIELDSET, LEGEND, HTML, & XHTML (Might be a bug in XHTML or HTML) Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Saturday, 9 February 2002

�� CSC@w3.org
Fw: Fw: GREAT NEWS !! Eric

Friday, 8 February 2002

Why does http://www.w3.org/TR/html/ point to XHTML 1.0? Jonas Jørgensen
FIELDSET, LEGEND, HTML, & XHTML Joe Kaczmarek
JOIN FOR FREE!... earn an extra Income over the Internet Aly Yangson

Thursday, 7 February 2002

RE: Height _ DO NOT OPEN previous "HEIGHT" - Virus Warning Vix
.�x..�W.��..�d..��..��..�� ! MXmhqK1WxoK8RffT03bmA23jkW tN2@microsoft.com
Fw: GREAT NEWS !! Eric
Re: GREAT NEWS !! Lori L. Paparteys
Re: Height _ DO NOT OPEN previous "HEIGHT" - Virus Warning AndrewWatt2001@aol.com
RFC 3236 on The 'application/xhtml+xml' Media Type (was Re: Plans for draft-baker-xhtml-media-reg-02?) Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: Fw: GREAT NEWS !! Simon Hill
Fw: GREAT NEWS !! Eric
Fw: GREAT NEWS !! Eric

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

GREAT NEWS !! Eric
pass this around, soory Vince I ment to send to the group, Re: Height _ DO NOT OPEN previous "HEIGHT" - Virus Warning Eric
RE: Do not open HEIGHT - virus warning David Jackson
RE: Height _ DO NOT OPEN previous "HEIGHT" - Virus Warning Julia Countryman
Re: XHTML 1.1 with namespaces enabled? (PR#651) William F. Hammond
RE: Height _ DO NOT OPEN previous "HEIGHT" - Virus Warning Vince Heilman
Height dsr
Re: XHTML 1.1 with namespaces enabled? (PR#651) Steven Pemberton

Monday, 4 February 2002

HTMLdocument.getElementsByName() behaviour grey area Rowland Shaw

Saturday, 2 February 2002

Re: [www-html] <none> Eric
Re: [www-html] <none> Vix
RE: Dr.Mrs.M.Abacha GROW UP Re: [www-html] <none> hadfa adddef
RE: Dr.Mrs.M.Abacha GROW UP Re: [www-html] <none> rosenne@spamcop.com
Dr.Mrs.M.Abacha GROW UP Re: [www-html] <none> Eric

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2002 23:24:15 UTC