- From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:22:50 -0800
- To: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
The website you site says: "I do consider the w3c membership to be quite representative of today's "big business", however, and this is why I also find this validity data interesting. " hmmmm.... do you think reality might be rearing it's ugly head (heaven forbid!) Let's make the web accessible to everybody but popular browser users! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu> To: <www-html@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 6:59 PM Subject: Why bother? > Has anyone else seen this? ... > > http://homepage.mac.com/marko/20020222.html > > "As it happens, out of the 506 w3c members, only eighteen > have web sites that validate with the w3c validator as > either html or xhtml. 141 members proudly display sites > with definite markup errors; a whopping 342 sites couldn't > be tested at all because of lacking dtd definitions." > > This is 2002 (not 1994), which makes one wonder whether this whole thing > isn't just a giant parody of hypocrisy (at best)... > > > /Jelks
Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 22:25:19 UTC