public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org from June 2007 by author

Ed Simon

• RE: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Monday, 18 June)
• RE: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Monday, 18 June)
• Clarifying the DN text (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Impact on XKMS of updates to XML Signature spec (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Get test case for E01 / DName Issues (Tuesday, 5 June)

Frederick Hirsch

• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-06-26 v2 (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-06-26 (Monday, 25 June)
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-06-19 v3 (Monday, 18 June)
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-06-19 v2 (Monday, 18 June)
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-06-19 (Monday, 18 June)
• DName space encoding (Monday, 18 June)
• Agenda: distributed meeting 2007-06-12 (v2) (Monday, 11 June)
• Agenda: distributed meeting 2007-06-12 (Friday, 8 June)
• Fwd: Request for Comments on Widget Signing Proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Action-41 (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Agenda: distributed meeting 2007-06-04 (v2) (Monday, 4 June)
• Error in "Decryption Transform for XML Signature" (Monday, 4 June)
• Agenda: distributed meeting 2007-06-04 (Monday, 4 June)

Hal Lockhart

• RE: Request for Comments on Widget Signing Proposal (Tuesday, 12 June)

Juan Carlos Cruellas

• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Monday, 18 June)
• ACTION-36 (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Wednesday, 13 June)
• ACTION-36: closing action message. (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Review Konrad\\'s message re xml:base by next call (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Review Konrad\\'s message re xml:base by next call (Tuesday, 12 June)
• On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Clarifying the DN text (and III) (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Clarifying the DN text (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Clarifying the DN text (Thursday, 7 June)
• Action-36 (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Action-41 (Friday, 1 June)
• A question on attribute Type of ds:Reference and its potential relationship with attribute MimeType of ds:Object (Friday, 1 June)

Konrad Lanz

• Re: DNAMES Section4.4.4.htm (Monday, 25 June)
• C14N 1.1 Appendix Updated (Monday, 25 June)
• DNAMES Section4.4.4.htm (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Minutes 19 Jun 2007 (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: DName space encoding (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: Review Konrad\\'s message re xml:base by next call (Tuesday, 12 June)
• ACTION-49: C14n 1.1 Illustrate proposed changes by example (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Agenda: distributed meeting 2007-06-12 (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Clarifying the DN text (Tuesday, 5 June)
• [Fwd: Action 34: Verify that CR version of C14N11 has no conformance-affecting changes against http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220/] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: Action 43: to produce example for breakage due to current E01 language (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Action 43: to produce example for breakage due to current E01 language (Monday, 4 June)

Richard Salz

• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: Impact on XKMS of updates to XML Signature spec (Monday, 11 June)

Sean Mullan

• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: ACTION-49: C14n 1.1 Illustrate proposed changes by example (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Get test case for E01 / DName Issues (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Clarifying the DN text (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: Action 43: to produce example for breakage due to current E01 language (Monday, 4 June)

Thomas Roessler

• RFC 2253 -> RFC 4514 (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: DNAMES Section4.4.4.htm (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: DNAMES Section4.4.4.htm (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: DNAMES Section4.4.4.htm (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-06-19 (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Draft minutes XMLSEC 2007-06-12 (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Updated Editor's Draft for DSIG-Core (Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51)) (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Get test case for E01 / DName Issues (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Tuesday, 12 June)
• E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51) (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Draft minutes: distributed meeting 2007-06-05 (Friday, 8 June)
• xmldsig-core: Updated editor's draft (Monday, 4 June)

Last message date: Tuesday, 26 June 2007 15:24:22 UTC