Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-06-26 v2

Agenda: W3C XML Security Specifications Maintenance WG (XMLSec) v2
Teleconference 26 June 2007
Distributed Meeting #8

v2 agenda: confirm Hal scribe 10 July, add revised C14N11 appendix  
proposal email links, DNAME comments from Konrad.

9-10am Eastern Time
(6-7am Pacific, 1400-1500 Dublin, 1500-1600 CET, 1600-1700 Crete)

See <http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Overview.html> for time in  
other time zones.

Zakim Bridge:
       +1.617.761.6200 conference code 965732# ('XMLSEC')
IRC Chat:
     irc.w3.org (port 6665), #xmlsec
Web-based IRC (member-only):
     <http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi>

Please note that attendance of XMLSEC WG telecons is restricted to  
registered WG participants and persons invited by the chair.

Chair:
    Frederick Hirsch

Regrets:
    none

1) Administrivia: scribe confirmation, next meeting, other

1a)  Ed Simon is scheduled to scribe.

The current scribe list is at the end of this message.

    Scribe Instructions:
    http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html

1b)   Meeting planning

Next meeting: Tuesday 10 July. Scribe: Hal Lockhart

No teleconference 3 July, meeting cancelled.

1c) Workshop, please solicit position papers

Announcement: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/
CFP: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp.html

Third day (27 September) added for WG interop meeting.
Thank you to Verisign for hosting Workshop and additional interop day.

1d) XML Signature usage Note

XML Core WG agreeable to XML Security Specifications Maintenance WG  
updating note.

2) Review and approval of last meeting's minutes
    http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-xmlsec-minutes

3) Action item review

    Open actions are listed in Tracker at http://www.w3.org/2007/ 
xmlsec/Group/track/actions/open

Procedure for closing actions: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/ 
Overview.html#closing-actions

[OPEN] ACTION-26: Thomas Roessler to draft CG note draft for  
submission to XML CG - due 2007-06-20

[OPEN] ACTION-35: Rich Salz to Review Konrad's message re xml:base by  
next call - due 2007-06-05

[OPEN] ACTION-37: Sean Mullan to Review Konrad's message re xml:base  
by next call - due 2007-06-05
Done, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/ 
2007Jun/0065.html

[OPEN] ACTION-38: Ed Simon to Review Konrad's message re xml:base by  
next call - due 2007-06-05

[OPEN] ACTION-48: Juan Carlos Cruellas to Make proposal to resolve  
issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/ 
2007Jun/0010.html - due 2007-06-12

[OPEN] ACTION-50: Phillip Hallam-Baker to Create workshop logistics  
page - due 2007-06-19

ACTION-54 - Ask whether we can add time to workshop  - Thomas  
Roessler - due 2007-06-26
Done, yes we Verisign will host additional day for interop.

ACTION-55 - Create questionnaire to check availability on 27  
September - Thomas Roessler - due 2007-06-26
Done

4)  Interop planning

4a) Does the WG agree to an open interop, allowing non-WG  
participants in interop?

4b) WG volunteers to assemble test cases?

4c) Please respond to questionnaire when available (extend deadline?)

5) XML Signature Draft

5a) Accept current editors draft, with additional changes?

http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/#sec-X509Data

- reference to RFC2253 updated to RFC4515
- "should" to "MAY" at end of 4.4.4
- conversion of last bullet to additional text, since not  
augmentation of encoding rules

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0071.html

Comment from Konrad
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0074.html

s/the string encoding rules in section 2.4/the character escaping  
rules in section 2.4/

Verify that changing from RFC 2253 to RFC 4514 does not introduce any  
problems

Thomas: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/ 
2007Jun/0075.html

Note: WG members can live with:
Defer removal of \20 rule to next version of Signature, summarize  
issue in best practices document?

5b) XML escaping

Angle brackets, ampersand, can cause XML to be ill-formed.

Konrad: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/ 
2007May/0041.html

Thomas: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/ 
2007May/0048.html

Proposed Resolution: Agree to close this issue with no change?

5c) encoding leading space, forgotten? Or remove requirement to  
escape trailing space?

Konrad: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/ 
2007Jun/0004.html

Need to add to bullet list in section 4.4.4. (see agenda item 7a)?

or get rid of item for trailing space, which should be insignificant?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0051.html Konrad

Proposed Resolution: Agree to defer to subsequent work on Signature?

5d) Add warning?

warning similar to that of section 7.2 of RFC 2253: http:// 
www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2253.txt
Sean: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/ 
2007Jun/0015.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0024.html

Proposed resolution: Record as best practice item in wiki?

5e) Reversibility of string to DER/BER encoding not guaranteed

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0021.html , Juan Carlos

Issue of reversibility

section 5.2 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4514

and proposed approach:
"state a repertoire of attribute short names that all applications  
must know and then strongly
recommend to use the form "dotted oid of the attribute = hex  
representation of the BER/DER encoding of the value" for the rest of  
not so well-known or even privately defined attributes"

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0049.html , Ed Simon
"I agree that XMLSig DName encoding rules should address the last  
paragraph of Section 5.2 in RFC 4514:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4514"

Second point about removing KeyInfo material from DSig out of scope  
for charter and for roadmap?
Update wiki?

Ask IETF for DName canonicalization, drop issue?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0052.html , Konrad

Proposed Resolution: Record as issue for next version of Signature  
and/or add note to best practice wiki

6) XML Signature: ds:Reference type as URI versus ds:Object Mime Type
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0000.html , Juan-Carlos

7) C14N11

7a) Current status

 From XML Core public list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/0049.html

The C14N 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621

Konrad had pointed out some issues with Appendix A at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007May/0046

7b) Appendix A recommendation

Appendix update: Konrad
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0073.html

includes changes from Juan Carlos.

Review actions:

ACTION-35 Rich Salz

ACTION-36 Juan Carlos Cruellas,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0029.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0041.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0035.html

ACTION-37 Sean Mullen, closed with:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0065.html

ACTION-38 Ed Simon


Appendix update: Konrad
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 
0073.html

8) Interop Test Case review

    i) Regression tests
Which original test cases to use for C14N11 and XML Signature

    ii) test defined in new C14N11 example (as updated)
    <http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509>

    iii) Tests for Errata
	Agreed at F2F that no tests needed for E02-E05
Test for E01?

    iv) Action to review and summarize test for E06, test for base64
    URI?  Test exists but not well-defined?

    v) Additional tests
-  test case for 1.0 as default see if 1.1 by mistake
- test case which checks for correct sig when xml:base is present
- test case which checks for correct sig when xml:id is present
- generate sig over doc subset, must include c14n11 as  final transform
- new generators not rely on default c14n
- conversion NodeSetData to OctetStreamData:
- Generate a signature having a reference with some xpath transform  
selecting NodeSetData
then we add a XSLT transform that clearly needs OctetStreamData.  
Check on verification: if the resulting signature actually made the  
use of c14n 1.1 explicit in the chain of transforms

9) Any other business

10) Adjourn

Scribe list
-----------

Elisabetta Carrara
Hal Lockhart
Ram Mohan
Anthony Nadalin
Chris Nautiyal
Rich Salz
Daniel Schutzer
Ed Simon
Andrew Sullivan
Panagiotis Trimintzios
Tarun Tyagi
Thomas Roessler (17 Apr 07)
Greg Whitehead (F2F 2 May 07 am)
Rob Miller  (F2F 2 May 07 pm)
Gregory Berezowsky (F2F 3 May 07 am)
Sean Mullan (F2F 3 May 07 pm)
Juan Carlos Cruellas (15 May 2007)
Phillip Hallam-Baker (22 May 2007)
Giles Hogben  (29 May 2007)
Konrad Lanz (6 June 2007)
Donald Eastlake (12 June 2007)
Peter Lipp (Konrad, 19 June 2007)

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 12:36:55 UTC